Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigg Red
Selling child pornography is not redress of government or agitation for reform. I'm not even sure an argument could be made that purveying it is political speech rather than abusive action. An ideological pedophile is not a concept I can understand even in a hypothetical. I guess you could try but I'm not sure you'll succeed.

As far as the rest... They are seeking laws to be changed. We should resist that change. We should say “No!” at every opportunity. We should raise our children to understand why we reject these things and why they should as well. We should feel free to vote with our feet anywhere they succeed.

I don't think we should make it illegal to express their opinion and say what laws they think should change. Bill me as a Nmbla (sp?) supporter instead of a free speech absolutist but know that I'm really supporting speech.

85 posted on 02/08/2014 9:44:25 AM PST by FluffyTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: FluffyTexan

You’re wasting your time. Unfortunately I’ve found FR to be full of the “free speech for me but not for thee” crowd. How liberal of them!


105 posted on 02/08/2014 10:09:11 AM PST by safeasthebanks ("The most rewarding part, was when he gave me my money!" - Dr. Nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson