Published August 8, 1961.
Posted on 02/09/2014 10:49:33 AM PST by FreeAtlanta
Authorities say the cause of death for the Hawaii health director who died after an airplane crashed off the island of Molokai was cardiac arrhythmia — an irregular heartbeat. Loretta Fuddy died due to the stress from the horrific Dec. 11 plunge into the water after the si …
(Excerpt) Read more at usnews.nbcnews.com ...
Published August 8, 1961.
death certificate name amended August 29, 1961.
The announcements are flaky. Some appear in one newspaper but not the other, some appear in both, and some appear in neither. Some appear in the newspaper 4 days after the birth, some appear a month after the birth. There doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason to how the announcements were put in, that I can tell.
And I am almost positive that Obama’s was forged, specifically by somebody calling himself Jeena Paradies who submitted the first full-page Advertiser forgery to Wikileaks from Austria. Shortly thereafter the wikileaks link was taken down, as somebody at the Advertiser farmed the image out to Mike Rivero at whatreallyhappened.com . IMHO, according to the evidence I’ve got.
I don’t trust the genuineness of the birth announcements AT ALL.
There are two that are definitely not kosher, one is the forgery for zero, and the other is the bc for Virginia which is 400+digits past her birthdate.
It only takes those two to tango.
Jeena Paradies
Country: Sweden
Occupation: Varberg
Member since: Mar 2005
Forum posts: 10
Web site: http://jeenaparadies.net/
Login status: Offline
.About me
I’m a webdesigner from Sweden. I’m interested in music and languages. I speak Polish, German, English and Swedish. If you need a new webdesign for your homepage call me: http://jeenaparadies.net/webdesign/
Never heard of her.
TRANSLATED FROM GERMAN:
Welcome to me
welcome, witaj, välkommenWas awaits you here? My name is Jeena Paradies, I live in Sweden studying “Computer Science” at the University of Gothenburg and work as a web developer. Beside I run this page.
In the blog, the themes revolve mostly around web design, (X) HTML, CSS as well as Private has its place there. Under Articles, there are usually socially critical essays. I imagine my work and my references. Finally, I would like to draw your attention to the blog name Jlog software I’m developing.
~~~~
And she’s somehow connected to wikileaks...how?
This is the full page I was literally forced to remove from my comment (on the 'auntie thread') a very long time ago...after some mixup I won't go into the details of...thinking I had permission to post it, and didn't. It came from the records at the library in Honolulu, iirc. Are you saying that the entire page that is on microfilm at the library was the product of some Swedish student web-designer?
I think it’s a he. I got a screenshot of the Google search results for the Wikileaks page when I searched for “Norman Asing”. The words were garbled but Norman Asing was identified in the Google search so I knew it had OCR. I found the actual link on Wikileaks and that’s where I got his name as the submitter, IIFC. It’s since been removed, and the screenshot of the page where I found it was lost when my hushmail account wasn’t accessed for 3 weeks.
from your blog site:
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/author/butterdezillion/page/4/
By altering the 1960-64 birth index to include legally non-valid records, the HDOH enabled both Virginia Sunahara and Barack Hussein Obama II to appear in the birth index even though they were sharing a BC# and only one name can be valid at a time under that BC#.
Virginia Sunahara’s name did not show up in a query of the database because her record was voided in order to allow Obama to have a valid record using her BC#.
The extremely rare circumstances of Virginia’s birth and death would allow her BC to be “filed” (accepted by the local registrar and delivered to the HDOH for numbering on the same day) on Tuesday, Aug 8th and yet not be numbered until after the Nordyke twins’ BC’s were numbered on Friday, Aug 11th. Those are the dates CLAIMED on Obama’s forged BC, but Virginia Sunahara’s situation is one of the only situations that would result in that kind of discrepancy.
The discrepancies on Obama’s forged long-form show that the forgery was created from the BC of a girl born at Wahiawa Hospital and having an R as the 3rd letter of her name. Virginia Sunahara fits.
To hide that Obama was given Virginia’s BC#, the HDOH had to give Virginia a different BC# when her brother requested a copy of her birth certificate - which they can easily do in a computer printout, which is conveniently (and illegally) all Hawaii will allow anybody to get a copy of OR SEE. The BC# they gave her is hopelessly out of sequence with ANY method of numbering BC’s (including the debunked alphabetizing theory).
The HDOH hadn’t made provisions to deny long-form DEATH CERTIFICATES, however, so when asked for a certified copy of Virginia’s long-form death certificate, they were forced to take out the top line which had the correct BC#, and replace it with a handwritten note of the BC# they had reassigned her. In doing so they edited out a field that was required to be in that line and botched up the font size, alignment, and wording for the state file number.
~~~~
So what I read here is essentially, aside from the timing of the deception, similar to my analysis, and subsequently a birth announcement for zero appears in the Honolulu press. If there had been no deception, you would see an announcement for the birth of Virginia, UNDER THE NAME OF TOMIYO SUNAHARA.
And three days later, on August 8, her death announcement appears under the same name.
The name is then amended on her death certificate, on August 29, when it becomes apparent there is no record of her birth. And that results in a Certificate of Live Birth being issued that is 400 + past her birthdate.
HDOH cannot issue a copy of her Long Form Birth Certificate, because, as they initially admitted, THEY DO NOT HAVE ONE.
You're right, it's a boy. You write he 'was the submitter' - what did he submit and to what?
The name is then amended on her death certificate, on August 29, when it becomes apparent there is no record of her birth. And that results in a Certificate of Live Birth being issued that is 400 + past her birthdate.
My impression is that the lack of a BC for the girl wasn't noticed until it came time to made funeral arrangements. Her death certificate shows her with her father's name. The family need to be able to change that, or her record will forever show her as being named Tomyio. To show her name at burial as Virginia, the death certificate needed to be amended. And that's when it became apparent her birth record had disappeared.
Have you seen this?
http://www.kycbs.net/Bishop3.htm
Fourth or fifth item down
Xxxxxxx
July 16, 2003
How Kamehameha
Admitted A Haole
By Bob Jones, Midweek Magazine
You thought the 1997 “Broken Trust” essay and subsequent ouster of all the Bishop Estate trustees except Oswald Stender ended the internal fighting at Kamehameha Schools?
Not by a long shot. It’s back, just as bitter and the newest trustees have stepped into a legal minefield that could take their legs off and alter the school forever. They’ve in effect invited a federal lawsuit and might cause the somnambular Probate Court and Special Master to wake up and notice that something’s very wrong. And then there’s the Internal Revenue Service.
And when some activist members of the Kamehameha Schools family get to the end of this column they should be pounding on trustees’ doors and demanding explanations.
School spokesman Kekoa Paulson says “Kamehameha Schools’ admissions policy and procedures were followed throughout the 2002 process. Both the attorney general’s office and the court appointed master have been briefed on the questions that have been raised about the situation in Maui last year, and neither of them have voiced concern over how the policy had been applied.”
I wonder if they had these facts.
My story goes back to November of 2001 and April-May of 2002 when K.S. candidates for admission were being screened and interviewed and selected. That was an unusual time of low applications for the new Maui campus and, so, low openings —— the latter set by the school based on the expectation of how many would apply.
According to well-sourced information, notes and personal recollections I gathered last week, the trustees and some administration officials at the schools manipulated the vacancies in 8th grade in order to admit the first non-Hawaiian student since some haole-faculty kids were let in more than 40 years ago. Then the trustees decided to keep silent about that shattering decision and did —— until there was a news leak from Maui campus officials in July 2002.
Faced with a Hawaiian community uproar, the trustees met in an emergency session with advisory board members and decided to say they had only admitted non-Hawaiian Kalani Rossel because there were no more qualified Hawaiians. Material and personal recollections I gathered show that was an untrue statement. There were two qualified Hawaiian girls on the list of qualified applicants, vying for one remaining 8th-grade vacancy that April.
But the vacancy was on the boys’ side. The school does split the vacancies by gender but does not require total gender equity. So the one boys’-side vacancy was awarded to one of the Hawaiian girls. That left the preference-qualified girl and non-preference-qualified Rossel unaccepted. Both had exceeded the test-score cut-off.
That should have been the end of it under KS policy in effect in 2002; sorry, but our admissions are now closed. That no-fudging policy had been adopted to end the old days when “red dots” put by certain applicants’ names meant they were friends of friends of the old trustees and that room should be created for them. The Probate Court had ordered fair, transparent admissions implemented by school officials, not the trustees.
In apparent disregard of that mandate, the meeting’s notes show, the trustees with the blessing of then chief legal officer Colleen Wong (now the schools’ interim chief executive officer) created two new vacancies and admitted the other Hawaiian girl and the non-Hawaiian Rossel.
Then after fixing the process in order to admit him, they agreed to say nothing publicly about Rossel, whose parents say they marked right on the initial application that he was not Hawaiian. The trustees claim they had planned to make an announcement of admitting the first non-Hawaiian later in the year. A source in the admissions process tells me that despite my doubts, that’s true. They wanted to wait until Rossel was in, it was an irreversible, done deal, and then they’d take the heat but could say there’s was nothing they could do about it. They’d also keep claiming it was only because of no qualified Hawaiian applicants and hope the community bitching would go away.
According to material provided, an internal audit confirmed that trustees previously deviated from Hawaiian preference during admissions with a non-Hawaiian student who subsequently withdrew before the school year began. It was the first effort to slip in a non-Hawaiian. Everyone kept quiet on that, too, and it didn’t cause a problem because of the student’s eventual withdrawal.
It’s rather amazing that the trustees could ever have thought such an explosive decision as the Rossel case could be kept secret. Did they think that since this new student’s first name was Kalani nobody would question his ethnicity and it would be a non-issue? Surely they knew there was high risk of a leak.
But why would the trustees do anything so stupidly risky and guaranteed to make many Hawaiians go ballistic without some advance discussion and community preparation?
The trustees have tended to play a very cagey game of balancing between the Princess Pauahi Bishop’s will (as interpreted by her haole husband after her death to favor Hawaiian-blood children) and the lurking problem of a federal-tax-exempt trust potentially being cited as racist. They said after this started blowing up last year that “we feel we could not change the admissions policy from one of preference to one of exclusion. We must stand by the decision, despite the pain it has caused. We do regret the way the decision was communicated, and we have apologized for that. The process of evaluating individual applicants is confidential and must be kept private in order to protect the integrity of the trust and the privacy of applicants.”
The more likely answer is that the trustees feared a lawsuit by the Rossel family if their son was excluded in a year of very few qualified-by-test-scores Hawaiian applicants. They wanted to dodge a legal bullet and did not want to make an announcement that would arouse the wrath of many Hawaiians who feel the school should stay Hawaiian.
The operational culture established by the Probate Court after the scandal of the ‘97 shake-up of trustees says that admissions were to be controlled by the new CEO, Hamilton McCubbin, and chief admissions officer Wayne Chang. But those two were overruled by the trustees and legal officer Wong....
Now here’s the corker. Up through the Rossel affair, K.S. admissions used the term qualified Hawaiians. That meant cut-off test scores. But that also lowered the number of OK applicants and opened the way for non-Hawaiians to get in if Hawaiian applications were very low. So the trustees changed the rules for school year 2003. No more test scores. Just a preference for anyone with any amount of Hawaiian blood.
The current website says “Hawaiian preference so far as permitted by law.” Ironically, that no-more-test-standards decision has really complicated things for the Hawaiians-only crowd.
Here’s why:
A lawsuit was filed last month in Hawaii federal court on behalf of an unnamed non-Hawaiian student who says that his civil rights were violated when the school denied him admission for this school year due to race. The attorneys are Sacramento, Calif., constitutional law expert Eric Grant, and local lawyer John Goemans, who successfully challenged the Hawaiian-only voting for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs elections three years ago in the Rice vs. Cayetano case. They will argue that if there are no test-score or other standards for admission, other than having some drops of Hawaiian blood, isn’t that illegal racial exclusion?
Many law experts say you can’t be “legal” with the IRS tax-exemptions code if you admit strictly on the basis of race, which K.S. now does. That word “preference” is unlikely to save it. It would fly in the face of the latest Supreme Court decision on affirmative action and many other, older federal court decisions. The trustees have been painfully aware of this conundrum and even stopped taking ROTC money so they could say they don’t get federal money.
Grant and Goemans will argue that a tax exemption is federal money.
New shenanigans like those that brought in the IRS in ‘97 over trustees’ bloated salaries could mean the end of Kamehameha Schools’ special tax status. When the feds stomped down on Bob Jones University for religious exclusion, the school had to pony up six years’ worth of back taxes. It’s been estimated that Kamehameha Schools could be assessed a billion dollars if it were to be found in past and current violation of its tax-exempt status.
Four of the trustees involved in that contentious Maui admission decision last year—— chair Constance Lau, vice-chair Nainoa Thompson, Douglas Ing and Robert Kihune —— are said to favor Hawaiian-only admissions. Only the fifth trustee, Diane Plotts, has been mentioned in news stories as amenable to opening the schools to everyone. My sources say she has voiced that opinion privately as well.
On top of these calamitous problems, Kamehameha Schools has the issue of the forced departure and golden parachute severance for ousted CEO Hamilton McCubbin over an alleged improper relationship with his secretary. He has denied that it was a sexual affair. McCubbin is married and also was alleged to have had an improper relationship with a woman when he was at the University of Wisconsin. He is suing the UW in federal court for defamation over that.
If you believe McCubbin’s position that he’s simply the victim of the jealousy of two former secretaries who were demoted in favor of the woman in question, then the trustees’ decision to use that matter to force him out could have been the culmination of something much bigger —— McCubbin’s strained relations with a board of heavyweights not content to let a newly-named CEO run everything he wanted to run. I emphasize could have been.
It’s been no campus secret that current trustee Douglas Ing and former trustee Oswald Stender thought the better-politically-connected Michael Chun should have been given the top job. Chun was demoted and subordinated to McCubbin by McCubbin when he was hired away from the University of Wisconsin to run what used to be called Bishop Estate and is now just Kamehameha Schools, with about a $6-billion corpus and ties to nearly every career politician in Hawaii.
Most of its cash is at First Hawaiian Bank, with smaller amounts at other institutions, but not American Savings Bank because trustee Connie Lau also sits on the board of directors of HEI Inc., that bank’s parent company. The competition for that money is not insignificant in a time of extremely low-interest-payout and big demand for new mortgages.
There have been complaints at K.S. that McCubbin was too publicity hungry or too egotistic. On the other hand, trustees traditionally have been campus butt-inskies and never more so than in the late ‘90s when Lokelani Lindsey instituted personal micro-management. (Lindsey has been convicted in a money-laundering case and is scheduled to start serving prison time in August.)
It’s gotten so petty and personal at K.S. that the trustees had the latest Ke Alii Pauahi Foundation annual report re-printed at substantial cost (some say $50,000) in order to erase McCubbin’s name and picture, even though he was the CEO and also president of the foundation for the period covered by the report and was the one who approved the report before the alterations....
I like the observation of a sympathetic, long-time KS faculty member, now retired: “The problem up there is that everything they do is done to excess.”
I don’t know how much more of this the school can stand and still fully function.
Says a well-known alumnus involved in spreading word to Hawaiians of this current dispute: “The previous board was accused of a quid pro quo style. Are we witnessing an emergence of the same mind set, along with a penchant for micro-management and an organizational culture focused on personalities, with power rather than service the dominant concern and with personal integrity cast aside?”
The lackadaisical Probate Court needs to examine who is actually running admissions, the CEO as directed by that court and the IRS or the trustees? The state attorney general needs to get cracking on potential fiduciary violations if it can be shown that the trustees lied in the Rossel case, and the IRS needs to consider pulling the tax-exemption because of too many violations of the spirit of federal law on racial exclusions.
The trustees need to come clean to the Hawaiian community.
Hamilton McCubbin and former admissions chief Wayne Chang and former legal officer Colleen Wong should be subpoenaed by somebody to testify with immunity about the admissions blunder and the tug-of-war over who runs the school.
End the feints and deceits.
Some candor, please, for a change.
– E-mail Bob Jones at BanyanHouse@hula.net
www.midweek.com/extra2/extra2
May 5, 2003
McCubbin out as CEO of Kamehameha trust
By Dan Nakaso, Honolulu Advertiser
Hamilton McCubbin, who brought stability to the Kamehameha Schools after years of scandal and controversy, announced his resignation today as the trust’s first chief executive officer.
He submitted the first full-page image of the Advertiser with Obama’s announcement in it. Up to then, all anybody had was an e-mailed scan of a “clipping” sent out by the librarian at the Hawaii State Library, deliberately blurred and not following any of the protocols for how the HSL handles microfilm requests. The Wkileaks submission was the image that had the C&P-type lines above Obama’s announcement, and no signs of 50 years’ worth of microfilm usage.
Is the author of this blog telling us that the birth announcements appeared in the Honolulu press, or not?
~~~~~~~
I own a set of paper copies of both of these newspapers (copied from microfilm) that were personally collected for me by a close friend. The copies that I own are from both the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star Bulletin, and were collected from BOTH Hawaii libraries that have the micro films, the State Library and the University Library. These were collected early March 2010. I also own a set of these paper copies from the Library of Congress in Washington DC, that I personally collected in 2010. The dates for each set are from July 23,1961 through September 8, 1961. I wish to make it clear that I am not claiming to have the microfilm rolls-I have the paper copies made while viewing the microfilms. The viewer has a printer that allows you to print the image on the screen.
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/05/28/extra-extra-announcing-obamas-birth/
No, she’s saying that the microfilm readers at the HI libraries allow you to make paper copies of what is being viewed. So she had copies of what was on the microfilms.
The copies made at different times showed that these microfilms supposedly LOST scratches over time...
NO, I think what we are getting at is the contention that the student in Sweden was somehow able to insert a full page of the Honolulu paper into the microfilm record. And I simply can’t buy that. It’s far more likely that some smart little wag was trying to muddy the record and send us on a wild-goose chase.
If the microfilm contained the birth notice, and it showed in both the Hawaii library and the Library of Congress, (If I’m reading that report correctly) then that’s where it was, scratches or not.
However - announcement or not, the sequence of events as I see them, caused the obliteration of the original Sunahara record, and required that a COLB be prepared for her to allow her to be buried as Virginia. When was her funeral?
Septemper 28, 1961.
It’s an interesting situation, my observations would result in the appearance of a birth announcement, whereas the contention that the announcements are fakes, requires that the microfilms at the Honolulu library and the Library of Congress, be inserted into the microfilm record 50 years after the event.
Which might be more likely given that the motive for the deception appears to have been to give an unidentified child an ID?
Not into the microfilm record. Just a full-page image that was claimed to be a scan of the Advertiser page from microfilm. Shouldn’t have taken 5 minutes for somebody to go to one of the libraries and get an actual copy from the microfilm if it was actually there, but a guy from Europe has to triumphantly put a public document on WIKILEAKS?
The microfilms themselves show signs of tampering, including scratches that disappeare And fingerprints.
I’m sorry, I will have to ask you again...did ANYONE go to the library in Honolulu and the Library of Congress, and take photographic images of the microfilmed pages of the newspaper in which the announcements supposedly appeared?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.