Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
...And there were things like scratches disappearing over time - which would indicate that scratched microfilms had later been replaced by more pristine ones.

Even my normal good sense of humour is deserting me, last question:

Did the scratched and the non-scratched materials contain the same information?

247 posted on 02/19/2014 6:51:09 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks

Yes, they contained the same information.

But the scratches disappearing over time showed that the microfilms had been replaced, which makes no sense to do since the information was the same on both - unless the replacement with the “cleaner” microfilm was to cover up mistakes made when the previous microfilm change-out had been done.

IOW, the obvious manipulation/changing of the microfilms makes all versions of them suspect - because you only go to the trouble of changing out a microfilm roll if you think there’s a good reason to do so.


297 posted on 02/20/2014 6:02:01 AM PST by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson