[ButThreeLeftsDo]

Wow.

A judge that actually respects the law, even if he wishes otherwise.

[gitmo]

Galluzzo did order that all ammunition to be destroyed. He said it was too old and dangerous.

What law is he respecting here? And this is without any expert testimony indicating it's dangerous.

[nvscanman]

Wow.

A judge that actually respects the law, even if he wishes otherwise.

Actually no...this judge does NOT respect the law...he merely could not find a way to contort and abuse the law
to allow him to steal this mans firearms. And in doing so
he made his position on the matter crystal clear...he
openly stated that he did not want to give them back but
simply could not find an excuse he could use to keep them.
He DID however make his point by stealing the ammunition that the man owned.....a clear case of theft under color of authority.

And the theft of ALL firearms in a home during an investigation is also another criminal act that occurs
on a routine basis that has no justification in the law.

[Bikkuri]

A judge that actually respects the law, even if he wishes otherwise.

That is exactly what I saw... Hard to find a judge like that anymore :p

Also, curious about 'blind'.. That is a very wide range.. if he can see enough to target an aggressor, I think he should have access to anything to protect himself.