Perhaps both, but name calling and casting aspersions on the messenger are tactics of the left.
My question is: Is he correct about the two ads? If not, we can overcome his rhetoric with facts. If they are, I'm certain there are hundreds of other examples that are verifiable.
It’s OK to use the “tactics” of the lefties, no? In a war, all things are acceptable. I believe harry dimwit reid is a criminal loser who is most likely somewhat senile and deranged.
I really believe he has to be deranged making comments like this. Those ads are NOT false, but using the common Democratic tactic of picking a boogeyman, in this case the Koch Bros, and then calling something that’s true a lie knowing it will never be disputed by the left wing media, Reid is trying to smear the credibility of the people in these ads knowing he’ll NEVER have to back up his claim of these ads being false. Notice he provides no details about what specifically is dishonest about them? No, it’s just enough to create the impression in the minds of the gullable that they’re false and that will end any doubt about Obamacare among the suckers who don’t think for themselves. Yet there are Obama supporters like Jessica Sanford, who supported Obamacare, who is on record saying Obamacare was a raw deal for her. Why would she lie? Or Edie Littlefield Sundie a stage 4 gall bladder survivor, and Obama supporter, who went on CNN and the Wall Street Journal to document the raw deal she got with Obamacare. That a man such as this would stand there on the Senate floor and deny these realities and accuse them all of lying makes him an evil man-—or mentally ill. This isn’t name calling. It’s empirical truth.
Harry is incorrect on both and he is also a pathological liar.
Does that help?