“or any violent crimes”
With the “or” added, it is clear the behavior wasn’t a felony, so just what would this include?
“Resisting arrest”? Which may mean you shrugged your shoulders at the wrong time....
Exactly. Vague wording works for them. They can then invoke this to deny anyone they care to their Constitutionally protected right. Well, they can try.
This also sets a bad precedent. Gee, why shouldn't we link to XYZ too. After all, would you want someone who is X owning a gun? Eventually they'll find a reason to try to deny everyone.
Not tinfoil hat. This is so obviously their agenda it isn't even remotely funny anymore. Remember all the assurances that registration was just about keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals. (how they planned to convince criminals to try to register I don't know but...) They said loudly and repeatedly "Oh, be serious, we'd never use registration to confiscate your guns! What nut-jobs!" Well, look at what has happened in California, what is happening in Connecticut, and what they're proposing in Maryland. Every single one of them has been revealed as the lying sacks of excrement they are. Never trust a liberal, ever.
The NRA et. al. and all those people decried as "gun nuts" were right: REGISTRATION IS CONFISCATION. It is only a matter of time. NEVER REGISTER YOUR FIREARMS, NEVER SURRENDER THEM.
I don’t understand why that is unclear. Felonies or violent crimes. Many felonies are not violent, and I’m sure a few violent outbursts are not officially felonies.