Posted on 03/11/2014 3:51:38 PM PDT by tcrlaf
That IS the question! I depends on how hard you kick them I think which will be considerable in most American cases.
People tend to look at people and think “Nah look at them, they look too young to be terrorists” anything is possible at this point..the fact that the co-pilot has apparently NO issue with letting total strangers into the cockpit for international flights who knows, maybe he was paid off to let them take over the plane. You have not one but TWO transponders shut down, isnt that what the 9/11 hijackers did, following the same MO
Unfortunately yes
Ok, I’m on it :)
Great :-) I sent you a tweet not knowing if it was you or not you know how twitter is
As has been pointed out on this thread, over 200 eye-witnesses saw a missile.
This isn’t an OES obedience training website.
The only question I honestly have is why are people so ready to accept any possibility but the most obvious. Now sure, it is totally possible the jet ate a flock of geese and augered in. Or had ‘something’ non Muslim happen to it.
But we collectively HAVE bought the drama that it’s ALWAYS something else. We don’t want to admit that it is likely the case because of what that would mean. More TSA, More BS etc.
We on the right are getting WAY to comfortable with accepting the MSM and fedgov BS, much as we claim not to be. Look at the Russia threads. These missing airplane threads. Spin and disinfo are being accepted and argued over by many.
But just perhaps the most obvious answer is the correct one.
A missile TOWARDS the plane that is.
Or are you admitting a missile in the immediate area of an exploding plane while claiming the two aren’t connected?! LOL, hey, go for it.
Oh, by the way, a gas combusting as a result of an ignition source is not "spontaneous".
Well uhhh....the people next door had sex and my girlfriend got pregnant! It was a miracle I tell you! A MIRACLE!!!!
;)
And jet fuel combusting with a spark is ‘miraculous.’
Yes, and all were interviewed and no missile parts were ever recovered from the seafloor.
The reason I put “missile” in quote marks should be obvious. Now go be a troll somewhere else.
I was waiting to see if anyone mentioned that Sarah. That is my theory. the Navy was holding missle exercises in that area. I think the wires got crossed and they shot down the plane. You know that the government would move heaven and earth to cover up something like that. Friendly fire.
Of course..and that is why the media keeps on saying that it was “Mechanical failure” they are doing the same with this plane, only a few have mentioned that if this particular plane had a catastrophic mechanical failure, how come it was able to fly for hundreds of miles more..if a plane is capable of doing that, its capable of keeping the transponders ON to notify everyone of where they are..notice how the media is bringing all the usual goons out of the woodwork to talk about this, Schiavo, even today I heard Kaldstrom talk, where the hell has he been all these years
Most MANPAD systems have a maximum engagement altitude of just under 10,000 feet, so you forget about a Stinger or Russian MANPAD system taking down TWA Flight 800. But there is one air defense system reasonably portable enough to do the job: the 9M33 (SA-8 Gecko) missile.
From middle 1980's on, the Soviets sold many 9K33M3 mobile SAM systems to a number of countries in the Middle East. With a maximum rang of 9.3 miles and capable to engaging targets as high as 40,000 feet, the 9K33M3 was potentially a formidable anti-aircraft system. It's possible that terrorists got their hands on 9K33M3 vehicles and figured out a way to "jury rig" a launch system that could fit on a small ship, complete with the guidance radar. It is possible that TWA Flight 800 was brought down by such a jury rigged system, a system that is not known to law enforcement authorities at the time of TWA Flight 800 crash.
roger that lol!
Inside job. Co Pilot?
LOL, take a pill, darlin. The issue is not changed by your attitude. This subject is so thoroughly researched I have no need of producing anything - a half second on Google will give anyone all the links they need.
But the Clintons no doubt appreciate your efforts to beat the dead horse and rewrite history - after all, it's their very fingerprints. She Who Must Be Crawled To will surely give you an extra pat on the head at your weekly review! Bwahahahaha!
From middle 1980's on, the Soviets sold many 9K33M3 mobile SAM systems to a number of countries in the Middle East. With a maximum rang of 9.3 miles and capable to engaging targets as high as 40,000 feet, the 9K33M3 was potentially a formidable anti-aircraft system. It's possible that terrorists got their hands on 9K33M3 vehicles and figured out a way to "jury rig" a launch system that could fit on a small ship, complete with the guidance radar. It is possible that TWA Flight 800 was brought down by such a jury rigged system, a system that is not known to law enforcement authorities at the time of TWA Flight 800 crash.
Perhaps. But it also could have been US Navy out of a sub. At the time, a report was made about purely electronic training and practice missile firings that had, occasionaly, actually fired a missile by mistake. So whether it was an accident, or naval black ops under the cover of a mistake, no one knows. But the massive amount of documented witnesses, the subsequent testimonies of witness intimidation by the FBI, the explosive residue tested on the fabric of the seats, the blast hole in side (not bottom) of the reassembled fuselage, the virtual impossibility of reproducing a center fuel tank explosion and the complete lack of any other such explosion in all of aviation history, etc., etc., etc, make the missile explanation rock solid and beyond question.
So, it was a coverup. Gee, a coverup involving dead people during the Clinton administration. How unusual, huh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.