Replies

Never saw it. It has queers in it? Well, that tells you all you need know about what happened to Walt’s company.

Nope, it doesn't. From the looks of it this "pastor" simply spews out allegations without providing any sort of substantive reference to back his claims up.

The focus of the story is on the relationship between two sisters. One is involved in a quasi-love triangle with a Prince and a commoner. The commoner does have a pretty close relationship with his pet ... caribou? So maybe that's where the "bestiality" claim comes from? Since the commoner and the caribou (or is it a reindeer?) are both male ... well, heck, who knows?

And then there's this living snowman ... not sure where that fits in to the whole queer/bestiality thing.

Otherwise about the only thing overtly sexual in the movie is the transformation scene of the other sister. Basically a decent (if somewhat prim and severe) looking blonde in traditional Scandinavian winter attire who metamorphizes (sp?) over the course of a musical number into a smoking hot (off Laz's hit-worthy scale) vixen with flowing hair, a form-fitting dress with a very nice slit up the side of one leg and ... cleavage (oh WHY did there have to be cleavage?).

But that's pretty much Disney's specialty, right? At least she didn't end up twerking, sticking her tongue out in unnatural ways, stripping nekkid and riding a wrecking ball like it was a mechanical bull, right?

I'm guessing if I were in early elementary school I'd have had pretty much the same reaction to that as I did whenever seeing Linda Carter twirl herself from Diana Prince into Wonder Woman. But I digress.