I'm disagreeing that Kelo was decided correctly.
The pro-judges saying effectively saying that if the "victims" don't like it, they could vote the the perpetrating rascals out.
State governments have the legal power to tax, upon the limits of which the Constitution is mute.
Read the article I linked; then comment. This isn't about whether you like what the City of New London did or not; it is about whether it was within their legal authority.