Posted on 03/15/2014 11:14:26 AM PDT by Rashputin
To equate woman's interest with the right to kill her unborn baby at her merest whim--or what else is "abortion on demand"--flies in the face both of nature & morality. In trivializing the profound function that has always defined purposeful feminine function, she is obviously no spokeswoman for rational femininity.
William Flax
No human progress without human destruction. That’s what that means.
Femenists revel in the fact abortion allows women to legally murder another person. It’s the only law that lets them get away with murder for ANY reason they want. No man has that power, it’s got to be proven in self-defense. But women get to be murderers and the state says it’s legal.
This is why Christians have to be involved in government - voting, running for office, etc. Don’t let them compartmentalize your life. The liberals live THEIR beliefs 24/7 but they don’t want YOU to.
"Ve Must Keep Ze Bloodlines Pure!"
The only way to protect women’s rights is to teach them to JUST SAY NO to unmarried sex. Hey, it works!
“Hillary Clinton tells UN: No human progress without abortion-on-demand”
Read another way: Hillary! says we need to be able to kill babies whenever we want.
I’d like to know just why didn’t her mother abort her?
Um, no human progress without killing tiny humans. Or are they just tissue masses/tumors. Sadly, Mrs. Rodham didn’t have that option so we end up burdened with the hildebeast.
Have you noticed that women, today, run around mostly naked on the beach advertising their wares to attract a man to mate with? They then support laws to murder the result of their advertising, beats the hell out of me.
she’s a wide-awake nightmare.
From the mouth of the talking farm animal. She is what she is. Reincarnate of Hitler.
That’s about it isn’t it. Still, there is an aspect that is different.
They don’t care if the guy on death row is guilty or not. They just can’t find it within themselves to meet out punishment fitting the crime.
Some of these people were caught in the act of doing incredibly vile things. No matter, they should get to live decades longer than their victims, every one of them asking for an appeal, and not a one of them getting it.
Babies in the womb get no advocacy or appeal that is HEARD by the Left.
The Left actually shares a good many characteristics of the murderer.
Make it easy. Just kill all the children.
When the state demands, you obey.
I note rhat Chelsea made it out of the womb alive.
Looks like Margret Sanger’s ideology is still in full swing. Her plan to rid society of her so called “human weeds” aka minorities, poor, etc seems to working perfectly as is her “Negro Project.” Progressives sure are consistent regardless of the era. Eugenics, urban living, dependence on government for daily things, mass transportation, destroying tradition and personal independence, disarming the nation’s citizens, dismantling the nation’s military, indoctrinating children and destroying Christianity. It does not matter what country or what period of time, it’s always the same.
That squares with her position on human life in general. The Benghazi Four would concur — if she and obozo hadn’t let them die.
So, let me get this straight, there was no human progress until the 1960s-70s, is that right?
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
