Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

Ummm. No. It is not. Even if you use all caps.... it still is not.


28 posted on 03/19/2014 7:27:09 PM PDT by RoadGumby (This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: RoadGumby

“Ummm. No. It is not. Even if you use all caps.... it still is not.”

YES it is. E=MC^2 is a universal equation.


29 posted on 03/19/2014 7:36:25 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: RoadGumby

http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module5_equations.htm#where

“I am in danger here of giving the impression that this quantification of energy conversion is only important in nuclear reactions. Not true: it is just as applicable to ordinary chemical reactions as well. In chemistry, however, the energies involved are so much smaller that the change in mass is difficult to measure. In principle, we would expect it to apply wherever work is done: when you do work W on an object by lifting it, one would expect its mass to increase by W/c2. However, because c is so large, this mass would be much smaller than other effects (e.g. the mass of your fingerprints) and would be impossible to measure. To see some values, follow this link.”


30 posted on 03/19/2014 7:40:21 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson