So the opposition’s argument is that if I create a Corporation I surrender all of my Constitutional rights in the act of running it?
That seems a little hard to swallow. Unless I misunderstand.
“So the oppositions argument is that if I create a Corporation I surrender all of my Constitutional rights in the act of running it?”
That already happened years and years ago with the quota and hiring systems.
“So the oppositions argument is that if I create a Corporation I surrender all of my Constitutional rights in the act of running it?”
I won’t speak to the opposition’s argument, but as far as I know you don’t create a Corporation.
The “state” (meant generically) “creates” a corporation. Whatever you propose as a corporation to the state is not a corporation until the state says so and the state might attach some hooks and strings before saying so.