Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RI state senator tells Second-Amendment proponent to “go [edit]” himself
Rare ^ | March 25, 2014 | Carolyn Bolton, Rare Staff

Posted on 03/25/2014 3:49:43 PM PDT by Voice of Reason88

Edited on 03/25/2014 4:48:25 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Voice of Reason88

Gotta luv the ‘rats.


61 posted on 03/25/2014 5:44:11 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voice of Reason88
That’s in the context of a multi colored flag.
To bolster my point – take a look at all the cultural references to Red meaning Commie.
Why was China know as Red China?

Yes, there is an association of red to communism... but there was an even earlier American association of red to hardiness & valor.
Or are you asserting that communism is stronger than traditional American ideals?

62 posted on 03/25/2014 7:06:41 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Voice of Reason88

You can always count on a rat to stay classy under pressure.


63 posted on 03/25/2014 7:31:47 PM PDT by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voice of Reason88
Question: Was Communism historically signified by the color RED or not?
Yes or No will suffice.

No.

The reason for this is that red has historically signified many other things, especially with different contexts:

To associate the color exclusively with Marxism (Karl Marx: 05 May 1818 – 14 March 1883) is to ignore its history across the world... or are you trying to tell us that The Communist Manifesto (1848) and Das Kapital (1867–1894) which are less than a hundred years old can uproot and supplant thousand year old history?
64 posted on 03/25/2014 7:32:09 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

“A guy who hates guns and hates our 2nd Amendment is PROTECTED by men who have guns 24/7..take away his armed security let’s see how he enjoys life then”


...like the guy in the outhouse in Jurassic Park?


65 posted on 03/25/2014 8:34:21 PM PDT by ourworldawry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
First of all, You were the one who pushed the strawman of it being:

“so crazy conspiracy”

As you said in comment 25

In addition, it was you that also stated:

“So, no, blue wasn't ever the officially recognized GOP color.”

And were we to follow along with what you said in comment 51:

“many of a them reversed the pattern to avoid favoritism.”

That begs the question – why weren’t they reversed BACK during the

“The next election cycle”?

66 posted on 03/26/2014 4:20:57 AM PDT by Voice of Reason88 ( Freedom is never lost all at once - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
Then Why weren’t they reversed BACK during the
“The next election cycle”?

67 posted on 03/26/2014 4:22:52 AM PDT by Voice of Reason88 ( Freedom is never lost all at once - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Or are you asserting that communism is stronger than traditional American ideals?

Please, you’re not going to throw that kind of “red herring” into the argument are you?

“red herring”
Etymology:
The name of this fallacy comes from the sport of fox hunting in which a dried, smoked herring, which is red in color, is dragged across the trail of the fox to throw the hounds off the scent.

Thus, a “red herring” argument is one which distracts the audience from the issue in question through the introduction of some irrelevancy. This frequently occurs during debates when there is an at least implicit topic, yet it is easy to lose track of it. By extension, it applies to any argument in which the premisses are logically irrelevant to the conclusion.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/redherrf.html

68 posted on 03/26/2014 4:50:08 AM PDT by Voice of Reason88 ( Freedom is never lost all at once - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Voice of Reason88

You mean after 2000? Probably because they realized it was silly to keep swapping.


69 posted on 03/26/2014 6:07:13 AM PDT by arderkrag (An Unreconstructed Georgian, STANDING WITH RAND.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Throughout history many different colors signified different things, but in the context of modern times, Red has been the traditional color of Communism.

As is typical of their tactics the RED [national communist party] is trying to confuse the issue by switching around the terms of the debate.

Just as they try to assert the absurd notion that Fascism is the opposite of socialism.


70 posted on 03/26/2014 6:48:51 AM PDT by Voice of Reason88 ( Freedom is never lost all at once - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
So now you’re contradicting yourself.

Then why did they do that in previous years?

If it were ‘silly’ to ‘keep swapping’ then why did they just happen to keep the colors on the opposite of what they truly are?

Let’s see – I destroyed your silly (your word so I’ll use that) assertions on the traditional colors of Communism.

The source that supposedly proved your point didn’t –

From your linked article:

Throughout the rest of the world, specific colors carry very specific designations and are widely understood by the general population:

Blue - The color of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada and British conservatives of the UK. "Tory blue" is associated with more right-wing, conservative political thought.

Red - Canada's "Liberal red" and Britain's Labor Party are considered more socialist, or left-wing. In some cases, red is associated with communistic governments. During the McCarthy era in the U.S., pink was the color of socialist ideology.

I also destroyed you attempt at using the all-to-common strawman argument.

What else have you got?

Why is it all fired important for you to argue the case for this?


71 posted on 03/26/2014 7:10:58 AM PDT by Voice of Reason88 ( Freedom is never lost all at once - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Voice of Reason88

Actually, that source does support what I’m saying, and I never disputed red being the color of communism. It’s important for me tokeep arguing this because your very tone indicates you have an absurd belief that somehow, the assignation of colors in the 2000 election cycle is some grand conspiracy being used to demonize the right, and it isn’t. I make it a point to highlight the absurdity of conspiracy theories. You haven’t destroyed a thing, you’ve been flailing about from point to point, and like all internet arguers who declnare themselves winning, you are wrong.


72 posted on 03/26/2014 9:19:45 AM PDT by arderkrag (An Unreconstructed Georgian, STANDING WITH RAND.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Voice of Reason88

Also, I haven’t contradicted myself OR used a strawman.


73 posted on 03/26/2014 9:21:08 AM PDT by arderkrag (An Unreconstructed Georgian, STANDING WITH RAND.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Voice of Reason88
Throughout history many different colors signified different things, but in the context of modern times, Red has been the traditional color of Communism.

Idiotic; why cede a whole color to some ideology?
Especially one which "in western countries, symbolizes (a) the blood of patriots, or (b) the blood of Christ.

As is typical of their tactics the RED [national communist party] is trying to confuse the issue by switching around the terms of the debate.

Then you're falling into their trap by allowing them to define what "red" means.

74 posted on 03/26/2014 10:43:49 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

The thing is, “they” aren’t trying to do any such thing. You’d have to reading WAY too much into it to draw the conclusion that it’s some subversive tactic.


75 posted on 03/26/2014 12:14:28 PM PDT by arderkrag (An Unreconstructed Georgian, STANDING WITH RAND.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
You may wish to stop before destroying your tattered credibility even more denying reality as you are doing.

Here's the problem for you, everything you’ve said in out there in black and white (and red and blue):

First of all, You were the one who pushed the strawman of it being:

“so crazy conspiracy”

As you said in comment 25

Who used that terminology first?

In addition, it was you that also stated:

“So, no, blue wasn't ever the officially recognized GOP color.”

Where did I make that specific assertion?

And were we to follow along with what you said in comment 51:

“many of a them reversed the pattern to avoid favoritism.”

That begs the question – why weren’t they reversed BACK during the

“The next election cycle”?

“Probably because they realized it was silly to keep swapping.”

Then why did they do that in previous years?

If it were ‘silly’ to ‘keep swapping’ then why did they just happen to keep the colors on the opposite of what they truly are?

76 posted on 03/26/2014 12:18:53 PM PDT by Voice of Reason88 ( Freedom is never lost all at once - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Because that is the Reality of the situation.

It’s a fools errand to fight against reality.


77 posted on 03/26/2014 12:20:20 PM PDT by Voice of Reason88 ( Freedom is never lost all at once - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Voice of Reason88
Because that is the Reality of the situation.

No, it's really not; your assertion does not make it reality.
And, in the end, that's all you've given — assertion.

It’s a fools errand to fight against reality.

Who's fighting against reality?
The reality is that the color Red has deep symbolic and traditional meaning which far predates communism — I gave examples/references.

78 posted on 03/26/2014 2:25:10 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
From the linked article:
Throughout the rest of the world, specific colors carry very specific designations and are widely understood by the general population:

Blue - The color of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada and British conservatives of the UK. "Tory blue" is associated with more right-wing, conservative political thought.

Red - Canada's "Liberal red" and Britain's Labor Party are considered more socialist, or left-wing. In some cases, red is associated with communistic governments. During the McCarthy era in the U.S., pink was the color of socialist ideology.

Red has always been the traditional color of Communism.

The Move ‘Reds’ about the Bolshevik revolution.

The Move ‘Red Dawn’ about an attack by the Communists.

Not to mention that the Chinese communist flag, the flag of the defunct USSR and a certain Socialist Worker’s Party in Germany during the 1930’s – 1940’s…

In the last 100 years, Communism historically signified by the color RED

Are you seriously denying these facts?

Are you seriously denying the Reality of the situation?


79 posted on 03/26/2014 3:27:44 PM PDT by Voice of Reason88 ( Freedom is never lost all at once - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Senator Joshua Miller, RI

Home phone number and Address...

401-461-8689

41 Talbot Mnr
Cranston, RI 02905-4124


80 posted on 03/26/2014 4:08:06 PM PDT by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson