Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Atlas Sneezed
Because the pressure at 42k is about 15% that at sea level, it’s only about 15% more stress on the plane to remain pressurized in a vacuum. Which is nothing compared to safety margins. (Yes, I know that it’s not 1 ATM inside at 24k feet, but the principle still applies).

They're probably using a factor of safety of 1.1 on the pressure shell. That would be typical for the aerospace industry with load conditions well established. But your point is well taken that if the aircraft could maintain lift, the pressure shell will likely hold.

65 posted on 03/26/2014 10:26:41 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: The_Victor

They’re probably using a factor of safety of 1.1 on the pressure shell. That would be typical for the aerospace industry with load conditions well established. But your point is well taken that if the aircraft could maintain lift, the pressure shell will likely hold.


Also keep in mind that the pressure differential need not even change as the aircraft goes from 49k to 50k, ambient drops from 19% of sea level to 11%. The pressure inside can drop by 8% (of 1 ATM) which means that the cabin pressure drops from an effective 10kft to 13kft (no big deal, with zero effect on the pressure stress on the AC.


76 posted on 03/26/2014 11:53:14 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson