Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

So what’s the big deal with short-barreled rifles and shotguns? I don’t see how they’re inherently more dangerous to the user.


27 posted on 03/31/2014 7:14:37 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Nothing to do with personal safety of the user/carryer: Usually un-mentioned in discussions of short-barreled is the parallel requirement that long guns have an overall length at least 26”. At the time the rule was written the M1 Carbine Paratrooper was the standard for a small rifle IE 16” barrel and 26” overall with the stock folded. The issue/concern right or wrong is concealability. Anything shorter than 26” needs to be dressed like a handgun. No folding/detachable shoulder stocks and no scattergun ( shotgun) bores. Until recent times it was always about gummint income, not safety or bans, the rules created tax income for those guns falling outside the rules-——no more—no less.


55 posted on 03/31/2014 12:50:06 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson