Whoever wrote that seem oblivious (or pretends to be) when dealing with sixth grade students(!) that the statement is not fact but fantasy; "let's pretend..." would be an honest introductory phrase were it not for the more egregious reality that if the real world politicians, from the president, and both houses of congress on down either are more ignorant functionally than sixth graders, or pretend to be while pushing arbitrary tyranny on the citizens.
Aside from that it is stupidity or ignorance to imply or suggest to children that changing the ruling documents of a 200-year-old Constitutional Republic requires no more thought and reflection that an exercise by 11-year-olds.
If my child brought home that assignment, I would sue the teacher personally, the Principal, personally, and the School District collectively for child abuse.
And demand damages for the utter waste of educational tax funds.
Don't worry. I'm certain that no sixth grader has ever seen this, unless they read Free Republic. This is more bogus than an honest Democrat.
“The government is revisiting the Bill of Rights”
I agree totally. That statement alone on such a test should send a chill up our spine. This is not a government role, their role is to abide and protect the Constitution. It is the citizens role to amend the Constitution.
The answer they were looking for is to eliminate the 2A and add an amendment that makes some groups of people more special and protected than others-ie hate crimes.