Do a simple test
If a government bad homosexual acts would at most be tyranny over a minority ...ban heterosexual acts and at minimum it would be genocide of all humanity...
Heterosexually is a requirement of life like air and water..homosexual a preference like beer and cigarettes..they are not equal in necessity
a prohibition on beer and cigarettes is not equal to a prohibition on air and water now from a libertarian perspective you might say I don't believe the government has the right to prohibit it either ...that's fine..
but to prohibit is different than to provide and promote to provide and promote clean air and public water is not equal of providing in promoting beer and cigarettes to the public.
To say a government should not prohibit is what the left calls a negative right to say the government must provide and promote is with the left called a positive right.
so why are libertarians saying that the government must provide a positive right of marriage?...a libertarian is about negative rights prohibiting the government for getting involved not about the government promoting in providing.
funny I think the new Noah movie might be the most a great teacher of hetro and homo sex
the movie leftest twist of the story is save the animals and kill off mankind...so what goes on the boat?..hetro pairs of everything Noah loves and want to save...
but as for mankind that the left new Noah hates and wants to see die out..he wants no fertile female to survive..it effect his want is homo pairs for man..because man must die out....funny ..I do see a connection in thinking
homosexual marriage will always be a legislative fiction like adoption. It has to be narrowly construed since it is not a inalienable right but rather a fiction based on behavior. (homosexual marriage is no different than legalizing animal sex or prostitution.)
It is just basic statutory construction.