Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear

I have no doubt that you have been thoroughly trained in the modern world of speculation — what you call extrapolation.

But how many times has our understanding FLIP-FLOPPED as we learn more?

All that extrapolation CHANGES periodically. We build the house of cards that you describe, come to conclusions, and then the whole house of cards comes tumbling down and we discover that things are very different.

Everything you describe is the process of formulating hypotheses that are waiting to be tested... if they can be.

The modern world of “science” has completely lost the humility that is central to science.


41 posted on 04/04/2014 6:56:51 PM PDT by Moseley (http://www.MoseleyComments.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Moseley
Your notions sound disturbingly close to logical positivism, i.e. that something can only be possibly true if it is falsifiable through some experiment.

The logical positivists were about more than just trying to put science on a firm philosophical ground. They were also about relegating metaphysics and theology to the dustbin of history.

Notions that are unprovable scientifically, such as the existence of God, existence of souls, Christ's nature as both God and man, etc. would not pass muster with your logical positivist progenitors.

54 posted on 04/04/2014 8:42:46 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson