Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I ran the CIA interrogation program. No matter what the Senate report says, I know it worked.
Washington Post ^ | 04/05/2014 | Jose A. Rodriguez Jr. is the former head of the CIA’s National Clandestine Service

Posted on 04/05/2014 8:42:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

People might think it is wrong for me to condemn a report I haven’t read. But since the report condemns a program I ran, I think I have justification.

On Thursday, the Senate Intelligence Committee voted to declassify and release hundreds of pages of its report on U.S. terrorist interrogation practices. Certain senators have proclaimed how devastating the findings are, saying the CIA’s program was unproductive, badly managed and misleadingly sold. Unlike the committee’s staff, I don’t have to examine the program through a rearview mirror. I was responsible for administering it, and I know that it produced critical intelligence that helped decimate al-Qaeda and save American lives.

The committee’s staff members started with a conclusion in 2009 and have chased supportive evidence ever since. They never spoke to me or other top CIA leaders involved in the program, or let us see the report. Without reviewing it, I cannot offer a detailed rebuttal. But there are things the public should consider.

The first is context. The detention and interrogation program was not built in a vacuum. It was created in the months after Sept. 11, 2001, when nearly 3,000 men, women and children were murdered. It was constructed shortly after Richard Reid narrowly missed bringing down an airliner with explosives hidden in his shoes. It continued while U.S. intelligence learned that rogue Pakistani scientists had met with Osama bin Laden to discuss the possibility of creating crude nuclear devices.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: cia; interrogation; terrorism; torture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Chode
"a very profound and yet disturbing thought... "

All involved need a Presidential Amnesty. It should have come from GW Bush, but any POTUS will do.

81 posted on 04/05/2014 4:50:32 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
100%
82 posted on 04/05/2014 4:56:50 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
No. One of the conditions in the treaty that was set by the US was that we would try our own people.

So, who should we charge?

The International Criminal Court (ICC or ICCt)is a permanent international tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression.

The ICC was created by the Rome Statute which came into force on 1 July 2002. The Court has established itself in The Hague, Netherlands, but its proceedings may take place anywhere. It is intended to complement existing national judicial systems, and may only exercise its jurisdiction when national courts are unwilling or unable to investigate or prosecute such crimes. The US is not a party to the ICC along with Sudan and Israel to name a few.

83 posted on 04/05/2014 5:58:44 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
Jose, you can go to hell and take your depraved “program” with you. You made every JAG Officer a liar and we hate that.

I like JAG officers, but not every one of them is Tom Cruise, and you don't sound like him neither. Ever been shot at? It wonderfully clarifies your thinking.

84 posted on 04/05/2014 9:57:27 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU*ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
I am a female.

Oh.

85 posted on 04/05/2014 10:00:54 PM PDT by SandwicheGuy (*The butter acts as a lubricant and speeds up the CPU*ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SandwicheGuy

Oh and btw

Tom Cruise doesn’t sound like a real JAG


86 posted on 04/06/2014 3:46:30 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

You can disagree with being a signatory to this treaty but the fact remains that we did sign it and we should honor our word.

Anyone believing that "honoring our word" requires us to commit national suicide is simply not rooted in reality.

Anyone believing that water boarding is the equivalent of what our POW's endured in Southeast Asia is again, not rooted in reality.

Anyone who thinks that acres of body bags filled with Americans is preferable to harsh interrogation of illegal combatants (as you call them) needs to do some soul searching.

87 posted on 04/06/2014 10:31:12 AM PDT by garybob (More sweat in training, less blood in combat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MarkH

ping


88 posted on 04/06/2014 2:45:19 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Navy lawyers against enhanced interrogations? Please.

You one of those guys that think war is the same thing as crime, and that the enemy has rights under our Constitution?


89 posted on 04/06/2014 2:48:47 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

I was the first female Army JAG at my post.

No, I don’t think terrorism can be handled by the criminal courts.


90 posted on 04/06/2014 2:53:47 PM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
We are supposed to be people who keep their treaties

Tell that to an Indian.

91 posted on 04/06/2014 2:58:44 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

This is the problem.

Terrorism IS war. I’m aware of the method of interrogation employed by the Soviets during that recent unpleasantness. Whether we put their spies up in a Hilton, or slowly amputated their fingers, a joint at a time, it wouldn’t have changed anything about the way they were treating captured US and allied spies.

Clandestine war is still WAR.

You brought up the fact you are female, and I suspect there’s a little bias in effect due to your gender.

This is the problem with the modern military - it isn’t the peace corps with guns. It’s supposed to be the means by which we maintain the integrity and extent of our borders, and protect our national interests abroad.

The goal of war is to drive the adversary to the point at which they no longer have the means or the will to continue to wage it.

If it takes gang-raping a captured US female pilot, I assure you they will do it. By they, I mean all military and intelligence services, except perhaps the Canadians and maybe the Norwegians.

Anybody that’s been tortured knows 1) it works, and 2) if it saves the lives of their comrades under arms it is the least expensive way to obtain truly actionable intelligence that there is and it will be done.

You know what the worst thing about it is? None of the enemies we are up against are stupid enough to actually put mothers and sisters in positions where they can be captured and tortured. And what is a little worse is that whether the captured female has intelligence or not, the likelihood of them being raped is 5 chances out of 6. Higher in Islamic countries.

Because of that, it is easier to kill them than risk them going back and blabbing about it after a prisoner exchange. The exception to that is Russia, who in general tried to preserve the ‘value’ of tradable female spies, since they used so many of their own.

That isn’t true with female combat soldiers. Better returned dead, or not at all, than alive to tell about the war crimes.

Females and homosexuals make great spies, and they should serve in those positions. They make horrible soldiers and put their entire force in jeopardy every time they go outside the wire.

I haven’t even talked about the havoc it causes families stateside.

I find it funny that with the American Revolution, suddenly war is conducted by a new set of rules. Prior to Pax Americana, the way to win was to eliminate the entire race. This is why there are no more Picts, Lombards, or Carthaginians. Slaughtered down to the last baby.

Nowadays, when you fight with the US, you can expect a check in the mail when it is over and we win. Even the Russians got one, and they invested those proceeds to use against us once again. The Romans were brutal, but they knew not to harbor a threat when you could end it instead.


92 posted on 04/06/2014 3:25:20 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson