Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2

The second page of the article says the cost would be $6 to $7 dollars a barrel.

If that is the case then can the system be ginned up to mass market levels?

If so there are going to be a lot of unemployed roughnecks who used to work in oil fields


9 posted on 04/07/2014 7:04:00 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Fai Mao
I think this is another gov't "10 year plan".

Hopefully I'm wrong, but don't hold your breath.

12 posted on 04/07/2014 7:11:57 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao

So basically, I assume, since nuke powerplants cannot be shut down, when not used for power, they would produce this stuff..


17 posted on 04/07/2014 7:17:03 PM PDT by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao
The second page of the article says the cost would be $6 to $7 dollars a barrel.

I saw $3-$6/gallon. At that price is would be a little expensive for auto fuel, but might be worth it for a carrier to avoid the logistics problems of delivering jet fuel to it. Since nuclear reactors work best at a constant power output, it might be useful at night when nuclear plants on land are underutilized. Also if the production method can handle intermittent power like solar or wind, it might be a good storage method for those forms of energy (with the added benefit of a surplus of rare bird feathers for ladies' hats like in the Edwarian era from the eagle whacking turbines.).

If that is the case then can the system be ginned up to mass market levels?

Hmm, nuclear gin. I can see some glow in the dark martinis from Charenkov radiation.

20 posted on 04/07/2014 7:41:45 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Republican amnesty supporters don't care whether their own homes are called mansions or haciendas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao
"The predicted cost of jet fuel using the technology is in the range of three to six dollars per gallon, say experts at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, who have already flown a model airplane with fuel produced from seawater."

Three dollars per gallon would be magnificent!

23 posted on 04/07/2014 7:53:34 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao
If so there are going to be a lot of unemployed roughnecks who used to work in oil fields

They'll find new work in the salt water conversion plants. The big news is that the middle east will have its money machine cut off. No more funding for terrorists.
30 posted on 04/08/2014 12:32:26 AM PDT by redheadtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao

3 to 6 Dollars a GALLON.
don’t shut down those oil fields yet...


32 posted on 04/08/2014 3:30:38 AM PDT by Kozak ("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson