Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nuke rocketeer; cpdiii
While it probably consumes more energy than it produces, it eliminates the long supply line. Nuclear powered aircraft carriers could fuel their own aircraft, and fuel ships would not need to leave the fleet and travel thousands of miles to refuel.

There would be tremendous savings in cost due to travel and valuable tactical advantages.

35 posted on 04/08/2014 11:38:44 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Obamacare: You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Chandler

Not totally, the surface escort ships are all non-nuke and will need a fuel supply. Like someone else posted, you still need food too.

The reactor would have to be upscaled at least a factor of 10 to make enough fuel for the aircraft and escorts, with the increased cost and if the size of the ship is kept constant, a loss in carrying capacity.

Bottom line, I bet it will not be worthwhile.


36 posted on 04/08/2014 12:53:40 PM PDT by nuke rocketeer (File CONGRESS.SYS corrupted: Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson