Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker
The evidence at the time did not support the charge but proprietorial misconduct nailed him.

They never seem to mention who the prosecutors were.

7 posted on 04/08/2014 5:00:09 PM PDT by aimhigh (John 14:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: aimhigh

Yes! They need to post the names very publicly.


10 posted on 04/08/2014 5:08:57 PM PDT by zeugma (Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss (I'll see you again someday Hope))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

I saw the prosecutor’s name in another article. The article said his old files were being reviewed after another guy was released for a wrongful conviction.


15 posted on 04/08/2014 5:25:42 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh
They never seem to mention who the prosecutors were.

About a decade ago, the Richmond Times-Disgrace editorialized that they would refuse to embarrass the great heroes of law enforcement when these "rare" events happened. I doubt that's still policy, but I'm not sure. A lot of these "Law & Order" hacks went on to be very powerful.

Hey, wasn't this Giullani time? And Andrew McCarthy? Just curious ...

24 posted on 04/08/2014 6:48:24 PM PDT by Forgotten Amendments (On the wrong side of history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson