Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman Blake Farenthold: "I Don't Think Mr. Holder Should Be Here"
Blake Farenthold's Press Release ^ | April 8, 2014 | Blake Farenthold

Posted on 04/09/2014 12:15:33 PM PDT by FR_addict

Today, U.S. Congressman Blake Farenthold (TX-27) attended a House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing on the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Attorney General Eric Holder was the sole witness. Today marked the seventh time General Holder has testified before the Judiciary Committee since his confirmation in 2009.

Congressman Farenthold did not question Holder during the hearing because he felt that, since the Attorney General has been held in contempt of Congress, it was not appropriate for him to appear before Congress as if nothing was wrong. Instead, Congressman Farenthold made the following remarks during his designated questioning round in today’s hearing:

“Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

You know, I understand that this Committee has the constitutional duty of oversight over the Department of Justice and that's why we have Mr. Holder here today – but I don't think I can be a part of eroding the constitutional balance of power, favoring the executive over the legislative.

I don't think Mr. Holder should be here. He's in contempt of this body. I've called for his resignation, I've sponsored articles of impeachment and, this week, I'm going to be introducing legislation that would prevent federal employees who are held in contempt of Congress or who fail to fully comply with a Congressional subpoena from being paid their taxpayer-funded salary. I'm going to try and get that [the legislation] included with the appropriations bills that’ll be going through.

I’m committed to maintaining the constitutional balance of power and the authority this branch – this Legislative Branch – has, and I just don’t think it’s appropriate [that] Mr. Holder be here. If an American citizen had not complied with one of the Justice Department subpoenas, they would be in jail – not sitting here testifying.

But I realize there are questions to be asked, and I’ll yield the remainder of my time to Mr. Gowdy.”


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: ag; blakefarenthold; courtcase; doj; ericholder; holder; remove; sue; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
Thanks goodness for Louie Gohmert and Blake Farenthold.

The House needs to hold Holder accountable.

1 posted on 04/09/2014 12:15:33 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
It is a start.

I expect it to go nowhere.

How about, rather, proposing that any Senate-confirmed Federal official found in (criminal) Contempt of Congress be arrested by the Sergeant at Arms and held until brought before a Supreme Court habeus corpus hearing?

What, they're all too busy? What, it has too many unintended negative consequences and applications?

I'll see you Obamacare, and raise you a nation. Call.
2 posted on 04/09/2014 12:21:04 PM PDT by Robert Teesdale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Definitely. The House needs to hold the whole crew in the admin accountable because they only find out about stuff when the see it on CNN or read it in the Slimes. That was excellent of Farenthold.


3 posted on 04/09/2014 12:21:46 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Progressive is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
“Thanks goodness for Louie Gohmert and Blake Farenthold.

The House needs to hold Holder accountable.”
***************
I don't think that there is enough collective spine in the House to ever achieve that, at least not at the present time.

4 posted on 04/09/2014 12:22:17 PM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

I would have said “I agree Blake, this guy should be in a cell behind bars”


5 posted on 04/09/2014 12:22:30 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Is there any real reason why the Speaker of the House can’t have the Sargent at Arms arrest Mr. Holder and detain him until such a time as he decides to no longer be in contempt of Congress?


6 posted on 04/09/2014 12:24:03 PM PDT by null and void (The British declared war on the Tea Party. The Tea Party won! (Thanks mom!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Well spoken, well grounded. I didn’t think simple dignity and integrity remained in fedgov anymore. Glad to be wrong this time.


7 posted on 04/09/2014 12:24:25 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (FIGHT! FIGHT! SEVERE CONSERVATIVE AND THE WILD RIGHT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

But why did it have to be a guy that looks like Dorfman from “Animal House” and last name appears to be “Fart-en-hold”.


8 posted on 04/09/2014 12:27:27 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Historians will refer to this administration as "The Half-Black Plague.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Yes. It would interfere with his plan to assist the criminality of the Democrats.

that is THE real reason.

He has the power. He does not use it. Those are the facts.


9 posted on 04/09/2014 12:28:51 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart (How's that 'lesser evil' workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Robert Teesdale

but the thought is out there......its been said...and I totally agree with it.....nobody in contempt of Congress should be drawing a paycheck let alone stay in their position....


10 posted on 04/09/2014 12:29:15 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Its about time these guys started to play hardball.


11 posted on 04/09/2014 12:29:25 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
Holder's flippant “don't go their buddy” remark to Rep. Gohmert was despicable and shows what little regard he has for this country and our laws. Obama and his cronies are fascists who think that the people's representatives amount to nothing. I am holding my breathe that Obama doesn't declare himself dictator and end free elections before 2016.
12 posted on 04/09/2014 12:29:40 PM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Here is part of Gohmert’s exchange with Holder
http://gohmert.house.gov/#


13 posted on 04/09/2014 12:29:53 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Is there any real reason why the Speaker of the House can’t have the Sargent at Arms arrest Mr. Holder and detain him until such a time as he decides to no longer be in contempt of Congress?

I would expect that that would result in the appearance, at the location of the Congressional detention location, of large numbers of armed Federal Marshalls, in conjunction with a full team of FBI HRT operators.

The Capitol Police would - at that point - have to make a fight-flight decision.

Depending upon how they made that decision, at that moment... our Nation, as founded, could end. Right there, that very day.

14 posted on 04/09/2014 12:30:11 PM PDT by Steely Tom (How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Well stated. And he’s right. Conservatives need to call out the hypocrisy in this regime at every opportunity. He’s in contempt for violating a subpoena, but see what happens when Joe Schmoe tries to do that to the FBI. The IRS says it will take “years” to comply with the House requests for documents. Let’s see what happens when somebody says that to the IRS during an audit.

This regime is totally corrupt bunch of arrogant tyrannical hypocrites.


15 posted on 04/09/2014 12:30:36 PM PDT by henkster (I don't like bossy women telling me what words I can't use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

The Representatives are having to go over the heads of the spineless House leaders.


16 posted on 04/09/2014 12:31:13 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Why isn’t this holder SOB in jail? If Congress held me in contempt, that’s where I’d expect to be.


17 posted on 04/09/2014 12:31:39 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

I would love to have seen the Capital police come in an frog march Holder off to jail until he coughs up those documents.


18 posted on 04/09/2014 12:34:43 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: FR_addict

Damn!!

He’s right of course.

Did Boo-Boo holder have a reply or just sit their all smug.


20 posted on 04/09/2014 12:36:16 PM PDT by 12th_Monkey (One man one vote is a big fail, when the "one" man is an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson