[xzins]

Read the daughter’s comments

Puts everything into perspective

The opinion that they are just squatters gets blown out of the water by her words. They are more than that and can’t be dismissed like that. Their family’s been there for multiple generations.

[Lou Budvis]

“The opinion that they are just squatters gets blown out of the water by her words. They are more than that and can’t be dismissed like that. Their family’s been there for multiple generations.”

So? The Native Americans were there a lot longer than these people. Spain and Mexico had the land before that. As long as we’re not going to recognize the law about who owns the land, why stop with the Bundys?

[GAFreedom]

The opinion that they are just squatters gets blown out of the water by her words. They are more than that and can’t be dismissed like that. Their family’s been there for multiple generations.

But that has no legal meaning. They can't claim adverse possession. They can't claim squatter's rights in that state. They have no title to the land and they refused to pay the fees for the rights to graze. It doesn't matter how we feel or what we think - those are the cold facts and the law must be adhered to.

Remember, to give in to emotionalism is to open the door to liberalism. Conservatism is hard and logical.