Right. Because it's just that: a bizarre theory. I suppose I could delve into the threads which dredge up lots of old photos as people give opinion who looks more like whom. Some here seem mesmerized by that. It's just not my thing. (I didn't delve much into the "Fuddy had her death staged (or was she killed?) by stealth ninja divers" threads either.)
Instead, they have to make-believe (as indeed their entire theory is make-believe) that staunch conservative birthers—diehard birthers, no less—are Obot trolls.
In other words, they try to paint you as an Obot, in the same manner you try to paint me as an Obot, when the reality is that Birtherism isn't a left-right, Conservative-Liberal issue.
The born-in-Kenya/out-of-Africa book was not entitled Dreams. How many times do I have to correct you Obama-lovers on this point? It’s simple enough. Obama was recruited to write a book that hinged on his Kenyan birth.
And that book didn't get written along those lines, right? Now, let us ask what might be a prime reason why the book concept you're suggesting this agent was pitching didn't get written from the "born in Kenya" angle. Here's an obvious answer: because BHO II wasn't born in Kenya!! And proof of that is found in the year-prior media reports (Times, Post, Tribune) stating that the President of the HLR was born in Hawaii.
Why do you shill for him?
I don't. Though I do criitque the very flawed Birther theories. There's a difference between being anti-Birther and pro-Obama (though Birthers seem to continuously conflate these concepts).
Why not find an Obot site, where you’ll be more at home?
Birtherism is a minority view even on F.R. I'm finding plenty of like-minded persons here.
(And, btw, my Feb. 4 prediction to you that the CCP would kick the can down the road from March towards the summer is proving correct.)
“In other words, they try to paint you as an Obot, in the same manner you try to paint me as an Obot, when the reality is that Birtherism isn’t a left-right, Conservative-Liberal issue.’
You’re making this too easy. No, the Obot designation is not the same. I have a long history of advancing conservatism and criticizing liberalism and Obama. They call me an Obot simply because they don’t think clearly/all that well. Unable to defend their theory on a factual basis, they fall back on the only thing they know: smears.
In your case, I’m willing to be persuaded. Lets see your top three or four pro-conservative/anti-liberal posts. Followed by your top three or four take-downs of the liar in the Oval Office. If they’re sufficiently convincing, I will retract the Obot tag.
‘And that book didn’t get written along those lines, right? Now, let us ask what might be a prime reason why the book concept you’re suggesting this agent was pitching didn’t get written from the “born in Kenya” angle. Here’s an obvious answer: because BHO II wasn’t born in Kenya!! And proof of that is found in the year-prior media reports (Times, Post, Tribune) stating that the President of the HLR was born in Hawaii.’
Do you advance this because you’re an Obot shill, or because you genuinely can’t think clearly. Obama accepted the $ to write the book. So your theory is he swindled the publisher, intending from the beginning not to write a single paragraph because he knowingly promoted a fraud? Is this really the best you’ve got?
Face it. Obama took the $ to write the book. Not only that, but he took a second large chunk of $ to write the same book. The reason it didn’t get written is not because, having banked all that cash, Obama sat around day in and day out thinking, ‘I can’t possibly write the book I’ve been paid to write; I wasn’t born in Kenya.’. Do you have any idea how STUPID this is?
I’ll say it one more time. He took the $. He took the $ to write the born-in-Kenya book. If he couldn’t write it because it wasn’t true, he wouldn’t have taken the $. That would be fraud. The reason he didn’t write is because he’s lazy [as per his fellow lecturers at the UoC], dysfunctional, and a drug user. He doesn’t think well enough or write nearly well enough to pull off such a project. [Trust me, you don’t want me to demonstrate w examples just how disastrously Obama writes. You just don’t.]
What did they spike your Kook Aid with, CpnHook? You’ve gone beyond not making sense. You’re in an alternative universe.
Here’s a real shocker, Hook. I can tell the difference between conservative anti-birthers and Obot anti-birthers. This is the point Obots just cannot grasp. Like Obama, like progs in general, they assume birthers are very, very stupid. Too stupid by far to grasp the concept that there are Obot anti-birthers and conservative anti-birthers. I have a long history of recognizing the latter. Actually, I have a very long history of recognizing BOTH. I’ve expressed where I think you fit on the scale. However, I’ll await your passionate pro-conservative posts & your scathing Obama critiques before reiterating my views. Perhaps the ‘auuthenticity’ [good liberal word, no?] of your (prior) staunchly conservative posts will win me over.
Re: your prediction. Did it escape your notice that the date set for the CCP presentation was an Obot hoax? These people have no life and no honesty. They sit around wasting time and telling lies. So on the basis of one such lie you made a prediction to me. And you lack the intelligence and/or the decency to acknowledge that the entire thread was based on an Obot LIE?
I’m sorry, Hook, but that is not the behavior of a conservative. That is the behavior of a troll.