Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flying Circus
It is not an unusual situation at all. I worked for a tech company that as of two years ago still did not have any computers beyond XP and had a number of tools still on NT and even some on DOS/Win 3.1 and we had a huge IT staff. The problem is that we had a lot of proprietary software that was mission critical that was very expensive to upgrade to work with new operating systems and tools that couldn’t be upgraded for a reasonable cost or was impossible because the vendors were no longer around.

I've run across the same a time or two. I guess that the solution would be to start reviewing applications to make new purchases less proprietary and less likely to choke on newer platforms. I'm running an old WinAmp that was around with Win95 on a Win7 platform. I realize it's a lot less complicated than some of the huge apps that businesses need, but I find it difficult to understand why folks keep painting themselves into corners by having special apps contracted for development with no plan to upgrade after a certain expected life span. The companies that develop the software are the biggest winners.

On the flip side, we also try to adapt COTS apps for other than the originally intended use and that creates its own ball of wax.

42 posted on 04/13/2014 7:02:08 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: trebb

A lot of our tools were custom made by small companies because the big suppliers weren’t interested in modifying their standard semiconductor tools to our needs. As a result, we had tool sets that were hard to get software updates for and many of them were orphaned.

A lot of our control software was developed in house when we were part of a much bigger company and before vendors had realized the market for off the shelf software to fulfill those functions. These were integrated shop floor and quality control systems at worldwide sites that posed significant costs and risks for changes so they were being put off as long as possible. New systems were being tried, but were still limited in scope and were rapidly increasing in complexity and cost to match the internal systems we already had.


58 posted on 04/13/2014 6:14:08 PM PDT by Flying Circus (God save us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson