Reminder to arm cat... 
Posted on 04/13/2014 8:56:24 AM PDT by KeyLargo
TITLE LXII
CRIMINAL CODE
CHAPTER 641
FALSIFICATION IN OFFICIAL MATTERS
Section 641:2
641:2 False Swearing. – A person is guilty of a misdemeanor if:
I. He makes a false statement under oath or affirmation or swears or affirms the truth of such a statement previously made and he does not believe the statement to be true if:
(a) The falsification occurs in an official proceeding, as defined in RSA 641:1, II, or is made with a purpose to mislead a public servant in performing his official function; or
(b) The statement is one which is required by law to be sworn or affirmed before a notary or other person authorized to administer oaths; or
II. He makes inconsistent statements under oath or affirmation, both within the period of limitations, one of which is false and not believed by him to be true. In a prosecution under this section, it need not be alleged or proved which of the statements is false but only that one or the other was false and not believed by the defendant to be true.
III. No person shall be guilty under this section if he retracts the falsification before it becomes manifest that the falsification was or would be exposed.
Rental.
Another emery combatant downed in the War on Drugs. keep the fires going on the home front! We’ll get all those pot heads if it takes a trillion dollars.
enemy
Evidently the Chicago area has so little crime that major resources are available to pursue the likes of this woman.
But why were they interested in her anyway? Recording license plates at the gardening business? Credit card receipts? Warranty info?
Thank you for posting that...that issue will be addressed; my wife is still stressed (frisked by a male officer while I was never searched), and it is affecting her health...the topic needs to be approached gingerly.
Seems like every day we hear about how the federal govt. is targeting it’s own citizens for some reason or another. They won’t go after ILLEGALS because they would be to dangerous. Nothing but a bunch of JACK BOOTED THUGS.
It’s time to strip these assholes of their power.
BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!
LOL, what is a chicken cooker? I thought that was whoever was cooking the chicken?
It’s what grandma called a pressure cooker.
Yep.
“First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist; Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist; Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist; Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew; Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me.” ― Martin Niemöller
Any destruction of property? Bringing you into disrepute and slandering your reputation by inference of criminal activity.
Yep, don’t ya’ just hate when the Bill of Rights makes it challenging to catch criminals?
Reminder to arm cat...
“I’m worried about that. We run bitcoin miners here (that weren’t available last year) and our electric is 10 times what is was last year at this time. Do I expect a visit from the feds >!?”
WILL MY SMART METER BE USED TO SPY ON ME?
http://www.theburningplatform.com/2014/01/31/will-my-smart-meter-be-used-to-spy-on-me/
Call Logs? Try Kilowatts: Reports Reveal Demands for California Energy Data
06/18/2013
Smart Meters
By Matthew Cagle, Volunteer Attorney, ACLU of Northern California at 4:34pm
Amid recent revelations that the NSA has been secretly spying on phone records and the Internet activity of people in the United States, transparency reports filed by the California utilities companies and obtained by the ACLU of California show that a significant amount of data about the energy use of Californians could be ending up in the hands of the government too. In 2012, a single California utility company, San Diego Gas & Electric, disclosed the smart meter energy records of over 4,000 of its customers pursuant to legal demands – and it’s unclear whether this information was turned over in a private lawsuit, to local law enforcement, or even to the federal government.
https://www.aclu.org/blog/tag/smart-meters
No danger...she was just coming home from work via the doctor’s office...she had just been told by her specialist to ‘avoid stress’. My understanding is that a male may frisk IF no female is available. (There wasn’t.) Still...why frisk her, and not me? I know where that leads in MY mind.
...and leave it on to simulate the length of summer days.
I fake out my hens in the winter, at the other end of the daylight. Turn on light at 5 am to approach a 14 hour day for better laying.
Actually there is a Robert Service poem along these lines.
Miner in Yukon, tobacco, no papers, but with a partner with a Bible.
Finally gets an obscure page and rolls a smoke — “It was the worst smoke I ever had.” (approximately)
I never have approved of no knock searches.
In most places they may detain a woman until a female cop is called or an appropriate substitute. I hope your wife didn't threaten to beat the hell out of them. (My Dear EX Would Have, the beating part.)
Get a copy of the Rules and Regs and hold them accountable. If you really want to piss them off find a lawyer, on a contingency basis, and sue the hell out of them.
Find a Lawyer on contingency, tell him the truth, a must, and sue everyone involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.