The fact the BLM tried to impair the obligation of this contract by stepping in the middle and demanding payment for the land based on a contract it was NOT a party to, is, itself, Unconstitutional under Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1: .......or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts
Thank you. I've not seen anything about how the grazing rights have been treated historically.
I know. Almost everything I’ve seen is about how ‘he’s a freeloader and should pay like everybody else’. They truly don’t realize he ISN’T like ‘everybody else’ because of the history behind his landholding.