Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MamaTexan
The range rights given as an incentive to settle the West would be part of the conditions of the Deed contract signed by Bundy's forefather. These range, or land usage rights are inheritable, and the contract itself stipulates who the payment should be made to.

The fact the BLM tried to impair the obligation of this contract by stepping in the middle and demanding payment for the land based on a contract it was NOT a party to, is, itself, Unconstitutional under Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1: .......or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts

Thank you. I've not seen anything about how the grazing rights have been treated historically.

32 posted on 04/14/2014 5:25:56 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Play the 'Knockout Game' with someone owning a 9mm and you get what you deserve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: VeniVidiVici

I know. Almost everything I’ve seen is about how ‘he’s a freeloader and should pay like everybody else’. They truly don’t realize he ISN’T like ‘everybody else’ because of the history behind his landholding.


33 posted on 04/14/2014 5:30:58 PM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as created by the Laws of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson