Oh no -- that is most definitely not true.
Even the Malaysians admit that the maneuvers the plane took after it was diverted indicated deliberate action by a pilot who knew what he was doing.
It made precise turns to avoid Indonesian radar and hit the aircraft waypoints that only a professional pilot would be familiar with.
And it could not have been on auto-pilot and made those kind of maneuvers.
And it had atleast 300 miles of fuel left onboard when it was set down according to aviation analysts who drew up the graph of its flight path. So it didn't just drop out of the sky. It went down there by deliberate action.
The pilot, pilots, or hijackers may have been alive in the beginning, and there is no doubt that a waypoint was reached.
But the plane could have gone north as well as south.
If it went south, at the end of its flight the plane had no pilot. It went on a heading that would never get it to dry land and flew another seven hours.
What purpose would it serve to do that?
You, nor the Malaysian ministry, have no proof that the plane landed nicely in the Indian Ocean, nor that it had any amount of fuel left, let alone a precise number like 300 gallons.
With Malaysians’ track record of erroneous information and deception, why would anyone trust their charts or analysis at this point in time?
The idea that an uncontrolled plane ditched gently into an ocean that could have thirty foot waves, and then sank, intact, to the bottom, is extremely low on the probability scale.
There is no way that the US government satellites do not have a record of where this flight went. If it crashed into the ocean our subs and underwater acoustics system would have picked up such a noise. Diego
Garcia is beehive of electronic gear that also would have tracked a plane, especially one that was not reporting on schedule.
This plane could have gone north just as well as south. And if it did, that has far more sinister implications than the dead end in the southern Indian
Ocean.