“84% of Nevada that is federal property”
There are some constitutional experts who question if that is legal.
This is the crux of Bundy’s argument, and I think he is correct in his reasoning.
This must be exposed and has the potential to be a bigger Fed Scandal than the Tea Pot Dome Scandal.
We are talking selling nation treasure to foreign powers for benefit of Politicians.
“We are talking selling nation treasure to foreign powers for benefit of Politicians.”
Absolutely. Some of us think that’s one of the goals of Agenda21. Eliminate rural Americans so the resources in those areas can be sold to the highest bidder. Including water rights. And this financial action is partly the promise that’s been given to foreign powers to convince them to continue to buy our debt.
If I remember correctly (questionable to say the least) when Nevada was up for statehood, one of the conditions for admission was that the feds would get huge amounts of the state to control. Ended up being about 85% of the state. A little much to my way of thinking but here we are. Lots of room for forts and ammo storage depots on that much land. Probably less than 1% being used for that.
It may or may not be constitutional for the feds to own this land. If it’s not, then title to the land presumably would revert to the state, which would presumably want grazing fees for use of its land, or possibly make it available for him to purchase.
Besides the cost of the land purchase, Bundy would then be on the hook for ongoing property taxes and possibly be required to fence in his cattle. All of which is pretty darn expensive.
Therein lies the rub.
I do too. Try tracing those deeds in NV. It’s impossible. It’s been that way forever. Who knows who actually owns what there.
You say: “We are talking selling nation treasure to foreign powers for benefit of Politicians.”
Happening all ove the country- particularly the west.
Idaho is a prime example - and ties in with Agenda 21
take a look see -