First; they came for the kids...
Posted on 04/16/2014 1:03:05 PM PDT by navysealdad
Bammy, you been here since 2005?
Tho' still available on the web...
(http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/128995-2013-02-20-unintended-consequences-download-pdf-mobi-or-azw-file-of-book.htm)
What damages? Seems to me the only ones causing damage were the BLM. Bundy’s cows were just doing what cows have been doing for over a hundred years.
Dirty Harry is a character played by Clint Eastwood. I’ve seen the movie, he was a hero of mine, and Dingy Harry Reid ain’t no Dirty Harry.
Dingy’s a whiny little wimpy punk. Just like the one Dirty Harry Calahan asked “do you feel lucky? Well do you punk”?
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
http://www.amazon.com/Unintended-Consequences-John-Ross/dp/1888118040
voting for bammey and his ilk has consequences and they are getting worse every day...
iespell.
Whoa, dude.
End sovereign immunity for these guys. It’s unconstitutional in the first place. The Constitution doesn’t mention it. It is judge made law based on a single ruling. Worse, it leads to just this kind of abuse.
That’s unconstitutional. It violates the 8th Amendment. Think how abusive that fine level is. Is a turtle really worth that much?
My incendiary response was directed at the Pretender-in-chief, hence the reference to “YOUR PARK” in response to Obama’s “my park.”
Sorry it wasn’t more clear.
Would need the Regulators to hunt these rustlers down.
I just occurred to me a few minutes ago that Bundy cannot be held liable for any fines or payments.
Wikipedia: “In the United States, the Congress is prohibited from passing ex post facto laws by clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution. The states are prohibited from passing ex post facto laws by clause 1 of Article I, Section 10.”
Bundy is being prosecuted WAAAAAAY after the fact! He and his family have been running cattle on this land since the 1870’s.
IMHO, there is NO WAY, legally, the US can prosecute him!
The court has been engaged in “Progressive adjudication” since the early twentieth century. The decisions are legislative in nature;i.e goal directed, policy oriented, balancing rather than applying the law to the facts. In short, our Supreme Court Judges are “policy wonks,” a role for which a judge is admirably unsuited by the very nature of his institutional role.
All we lack is Wilson Blaire’s laptop. Last time I looked the book was out of print and used copies were pricey.
Back in print (paperback) but it is a little pricey.
Good news, thanks. It is worth the price.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.