Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just_Sue

I agree. Hand colored. Not as skillfully done as the Civil War ones, which are REALLY good.


16 posted on 04/18/2014 10:43:15 PM PDT by boop (I just wanted a President. But I got a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: boop
I agree. Hand colored.

Hand-colored is work stupid. Invent a new process is work smart.

19 posted on 04/18/2014 11:39:20 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: boop

“I agree. Hand colored. Not as skillfully done as the Civil War ones, which are REALLY good.”

Uh, no. Several of those I recognize as being part of a series of real color photographs from the period.

Despite popular misconception, color photography did exist during the first world war. I’m aware of two different processes in use at the time, a chemical process in use by the photographer responsible for several of the posted images, as well as rather ingenious method of blending together monochrome images captured by a compound camera in use by a Czarist Russian photographer.

Though I do find it amusing that you think the real color photographs aren’t as good as painted-over black&white photographs.


20 posted on 04/19/2014 1:04:08 AM PDT by jameslalor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson