Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Savage Beast
But that discriminates against interested 3rd parties, stalkers, or some person who happens to be walking by. If we are to the point of anything goes then why not anything.

Sure going to make lawyers happy.

39 posted on 04/24/2014 7:17:46 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Excellent points, GC.

Surely stalkers' rights along with pedophiles' rights, animals' rights, gropers' rights, sadomasochists' rights, and everything else's rights must be considered.

And someone with--say--a foot fetich. His/her/its rights cannot be dismissed. He/she/it (could we just shorten this to heshit?) might not be able to control the compulsion; so heshit must be allowed to fondle, orally investigate, or whatever anyone, anywhere, anytime. If you don't like it--you're just a fetichophobe--or a heshitophobe--or something like that!

Maybe we should merely eliminate marriage altogether. Then nobody gets discriminated against.

While we're at it, we might also eliminate work, education, medical care, restaurants--in fact everything. They're all fundamentally discriminatory--when you think about it..

65 posted on 04/24/2014 8:03:29 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Hubris and denial overwhelm Western Civilization. Nemesis and tragedy always follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson