Posted on 04/24/2014 1:46:38 PM PDT by servo1969
Full title- "SEAN HANNITY Responds to Cliven Bundy’s “Beyond Repugnant, Beyond Despicable” Racist Comments (Video)"
The New York Times broke the story today about Cliven Bundy’s racist comments to supporters during one his recent rallies. Bundy said “the negro” would be better under slavery than sitting collecting welfare “in front of the government house.”
This afternoon Sean Hannity responded to Bundy’s comments on his radio show:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-m3JW-eK3k
Rancher Cliven Bundy decided to lecture his supporters on slavery and the “negro” on Saturday. Media Matters posted the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbnRnhrNFEY
Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, April 24, 2014, 3:30 PM
The New York Times broke the story today about Cliven Bundy’s racist comments to supporters during one his recent rallies. Bundy said “the negro” would be better under slavery than sitting collecting welfare “in front of the government house.”
This afternoon Sean Hannity responded to Bundy’s comments on his radio show:
Rancher Cliven Bundy decided to lecture his supporters on slavery and the “negro” on Saturday. Media Matters posted the video:
Dude?
The Washington Post posted his comments:
“I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he said. Mr. Bundy recalled driving past a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, “and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids — and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch — they didn’t have nothing to do. They didn’t have nothing for their kids to do. They didn’t have nothing for their young girls to do.
“And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” he asked. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
The problem isnt that someone had a different opinion.
The problem is that someone has absolutely nothing to add to the conversation.
The problem is when someone is only stirring up the waters.
True. Why didn't they?
WATCHING CONSERVATIVE RADIO GROVEL....
NOTHING NEW THERE
Naive and clumsy.
You insult me and then call yourself "PraiseTheLord."
SHAME on you.
YOU would have been one of those who cast that first stone. For shame.
The Treaty of Hidalgo Guadalupe, 1848. U.S. v. Gardner.
I don't always like the law, but that's the law in the Ninth Circuit.
A friggen nuthouse.
Sorry, but you sound like a perfect idiot. Totally uninformed.
Why then do you feel the necessity to post anything?
I suggest you use your time more productively. Get up to speed with the conversation.
He absolutely did not!
I have an OLD friend in Robertson County and the Texas government, she says, is usually pretty good with these things. I believe her.
I'm going there again next month. The first time I went YEARS ago I got bitten on my ankle by a fire ant. Ow! I had the scar from that bite for an entire year. My friend says that they don't have that problem too much any more. BOY, they were vicious.
since when would we call the truth something insulting -
I would prefer to refer to it as the truth, truth be told -
I’m a conservative, I stopped listening to Sean when they kicked the psycho leftist off the evening show. I don’t accept Sean’s brand of conservatism, he’s no different than the establishment in power today!
Thank you for your opinion. And I don't know if you've ever been in prison, but you've never been a slave. So you cannot tell me from experience which one is worse, and I can only guess. And that's why Bundy was asking the question.
He blew the whole gift placed right in his hands.....and in OUR hands. I want to commit hairy-scary, dang it all!
*******
I understand your frustration, but WE have to drag Bunkerville back to the core significance. Paramilitary terrorism is NOT legitimate government, period. A tiny, sterile corral for humans is NOT the “Free Speech Zone” in America.
This was a signal victory for modern American liberty. It is too big and has too many consequences to let it be defined by enemies or cast away.
It is OUR issue. We must keep it and keep it from being buried under rubbish.
Point well taken, especially when you take into account such uses of the word as in the United Negro College Fund. But it is old- fashioned and it is one step removed from that other word, and that’s what his detractors heard and latched onto, whether that was what he meant or not. It doesn’t bother me — I was done with PC a ling time ago — but it was an easy pitch for his enemies to hit.
“in the ‘60s they demanded to be called African Americans”
The 60s saw “black and proud” and afro-American, IIRC.
You are a troll.
*sigh*. Lets go over this again. ANY white person who every deems to talk about, compare, or somehow question just how bad slavery was, is a complete and utter fool. Bottom line, in the aggregate, it sucked. It was wrong. It’s something you wouldn’t wish on your worst enemy. To even deem to compare it against anything today, and argue “well maybe it wasn’t so bad” is the mark of someone who clearly is mentally deficient.
And any Republican politician who ever hopes to win an election again will run away from this guy as fast as they can. Rightfully so.
"Whenever I hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally." --Abraham Lincoln
Oh my gawd...He ventured into negro territory!!
I bet him and his family are Nazis and KKK members who sacrifice cows and goats in that rural barn of his. Bet they exchanged their white hoods for cowboy hats so they could recognize each other. Now they've been exposed!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.