“Love has a good chance of wining, however if her opposition is a white man mormon she will lose.”
First of all, Love is a Mormon, so she probably won’t be doing any “wining,” or “beering” for that matter. (Maybe dropping out of school after the 8th grade wasn’t such a good idea for you after all.)
Second, her Democrat opponent *is* a white, male Mormon. So, again, please return in November to gloat over how every single election analyst was wrong and only you know “the way it is.” This isn’t complicated: the Democrat Owens is white, male and a Mormon, and Mia Love is a black female (and a Mormon); those are facts. So, by the immutable laws of Mormon voting that you have discovered, Owens surely will win. You shouldn’t be using weasel words such as “if her opponent is a white man (sic) Mormon (sic)” then Love will lose; just state your electoral prediction based solely on Mia Love’s sex and race (because that’s “the way it is”), and be man enough to return in November.
(Why “the way it is” didn’t apply when Love trounced her white, male, Mormon opponents in the GOP conventions in 2012 and 2014, and why the LDS church that dictates how Mormons must vote decided to tell 49% of them to vote for Matheson and another 49% of them to vote for Love, just to ensure a 0.3% margin of victory, is beyond me, but then again I’m not as knowledgeable about electoral MoRmOnIsM as you are.)
This reminds me of something, boy this was 10 years ago now. Some guy insisted to me that Nick Clooney was gonna beat Geoff Davis and do so easily, because he used to be a TV news anchor in the area and people loved his sister. That was actually his argument.
He doesn’t seem so dim to me anymore, comparatively speaking.