To: jazusamo
Democrats argue that if fully phased in by 2016, it would push a family of three above the federal poverty line - a level such earners have not surpassed since 1979. Wouldn't it be a lot easier to simply lower the arbitrary poverty line? It's all a dumb numbers game anyway.
2 posted on
04/30/2014 9:50:39 AM PDT by
FoxInSocks
("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
To: FoxInSocks
Why not just declare poverty and homelessness illegal?
If it works for healthcare...
4 posted on
04/30/2014 9:57:27 AM PDT by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: FoxInSocks
“Democrats argue that if fully phased in by 2016, it would push a family of three above the federal poverty line - a level such earners have not surpassed since 1979. “
Except the ones losing their jobs from it.
6 posted on
04/30/2014 10:10:53 AM PDT by
headstamp 2
(What would Scooby do?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson