She can laugh but if she is underage, a crime has been committed.
The exploitation of minors has become epidemic. If we are going to allow minors to have sex, we should also allow them to obtain credit cards under their name. What could possibly go wrong?
This is the next sexual behavior boundary that the left will seek to destroy.
“She can laugh but if she is underage, a crime has been committed.
The exploitation of minors has become epidemic. If we are going to allow minors to have sex, we should also allow them to obtain credit cards under their name. What could possibly go wrong?”
Well the law as far as I can tell doesn’t treat classical rape any different from consensual sex. Both were minors at the time, just that the guy was 17 and old enough to be prosecuted.
Now should this guy be listed on some sex offender registry that treats him the same as child molesters or guys who rape women against their will? I think not: The crimes are just not the same as what he did. He was stupid, but it sounds like this young girl offered herself on a platter to be used.
As post 23 points out, we do allow minors legally to have sex. The 14-year-old child, boy or girl, who is incapable of consenting to sex at 11:45 p.m., because the potential partner is 20, miraculously becomes capable of consenting at 11:47, because the other party is 15.
Appy,
Take another look at post 19, wherein you are given a view of the behavior of the Urban Feral females which is all too common in Pooblik Skrewl Collectives all over America.
You seem to think the Urban Feral female is acculturated as you are. They aren’t.
Culture is determinative and their culture is not only very different than yours, it is in many ways antithetical to/irreconcilable with your views.
That Urban Feral female is the walking, talking, irresponsibly breeding, ‘poison fruit’ of the Tree of Liberalism which is alive, thriving, and well tended in most classrooms in the aforementioned Collectives.
momtothree has it right.