A 14 year-old cannot give consent for sex anymore than they can sign a contract to buy real estate.
I know that, which is why it would still be a criminal act. But if the accused was misled to believe that she was of age and was consenting, that should factor into the severity of the punishment, should it not?
But she was old enough to already have a baby?
Amuse yourself.
Find “The Maury Show’ on TV & see how many of these 14 y/o ‘girls’ already have willingly had multiple sex partners.
One ‘lady’ on that show has already had 10 men given 15 DNA tests to find the ‘fathers’ of her 2 kids. Still don’t have the right fathers.
Another 18 y/o ‘man’ was dragged onto the show for DNA test for an 18 month old child birthed by a ‘lady’ who was just under 18. If I do the math, she was about 15 when she got knocked up.
The 18 y/o ‘man’ admitted happily under all the hoopla that he already had been determined to have 17 SEVENTEEN other kids!!! This DNA test would determine his fatherhood of the 18th!!! And he is ONLY 18 himself.
Someone convince me that all these children are NOT being supported by the taxpayers.
You cannot make this stuff up.