Could it be an elaborate plan to release the “Blind Sheik” via a staged kidnapping?
the question then becomes...
1. Why would the US do that??
any explanation at that point becomes really destructive
The reason I bring this up is that anybody who watched the hearings can plainly see that security was drawn down intentionally and the Ambassador was sent on a fools mission!!! (from an administration perspective that would make perfect sense to allow/plan it to happen and have minimum loss of life and little collateral damage)
That is precisely what I believe is being covered up. There was a pre-arranged plot -- hatched by Morsi and Obama -- to kidnap the Ambassador then, on the eve of the election, exchange him for the Blind Sheikh. Both Morsi and Obama expected to win political points from the exercise.
This theory explains why Stevens was sent to Benghazi in the first place. And why he was methodically denied the security he requested. And why Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty had to disobey orders in order to mount a resistance to the attack -- which was supposed to be unresisted. Which also explains why Obama made no move to counter the attack -- it was supposed to be successful.
But, in the ensuing violence, Stevens lost his life -- thereby eliminating the objective of the exercise. Once Stevens was confirmed dead, Clinton and Obama were left to formulate a cover story.