Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kansas58

If you look at history, 1992 and beyond, the Clintons have either been ineffective or toxic when it comes to candidate endorsements.

Sometimes folks forget that even old BJ hisself never won a majority of votes for POTUS and likely would have lost both races if they were 2-way.


4 posted on 05/21/2014 7:13:07 AM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nascarnation

Good points. Ross Perot was a big factor in Clinton’s elections.

Clinton won solid majorities of the electoral vote in each election, but never cleared 50% of the popular vote.


6 posted on 05/21/2014 7:19:35 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation
If you look at history, 1992 and beyond, the Clintons have either been ineffective or toxic when it comes to candidate endorsements.

Wasn't it called the "Clinton Thud"?

7 posted on 05/21/2014 7:19:42 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nascarnation

The Left wants Hillary to look “inevitable” and she is clearly NOT!


11 posted on 05/21/2014 7:28:45 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson