And when they go to prison, the other prisoners are “wired” to kick their perverted sorry asses.
LOL! I love it!
Good one!
The study included people from all spectrums of society regarding their sexuality. But the article failed to differentiate the age range of children considered to be pediatric vs the post-pubescent stage of their lives.
I can tell by articles in newspapers and also some of the responses in this blog, that their is some confusion with the term pedophile. For example - take Jerry Sandusky. He was not technically a pedophile, as he is/was attracted to young boys who were past the defined age group of pediatrics, i.e. post-pubescent. This group begins at about age 12-13 for boys, and 10-13 for girls.
The sexual abuse scandals of the RC church clergy was nearly 85% that of priests with post-pubescent males. This is certainly ad abuse and very serious in nature - yet it should be more properly classified as a homosexual form of abuse upon minor males (not little boys).
When comedians make jokes about priests being pedophiles, they are mostly inaccurate, but with todays PC police it would not seem so funny to called these priests homosexuals, would it? But, that is/was the primary cause of the great majority of abuse cases in the church.
Good point.
I come here to see what FReepers will say next. That one is a classic.