Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lacrew

I don’t think LIDAR will even be necessary. Parallel parking is a pain in the butt, if they can do that they can drive on the freeway where everybody is going in the same direction. We already have lane tracking. The self driving car is happening right now.


68 posted on 05/26/2014 4:37:18 PM PDT by discostu (Seriously, do we no longer do "phrasing"?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

“I don’t think LIDAR will even be necessary. Parallel parking is a pain in the butt, if they can do that they can drive on the freeway where everybody is going in the same direction. We already have lane tracking. The self driving car is happening right now.”

What can I say - LIDAR is exactly what Google is using. So I’m fairly sure its very necessary. An enormously expensive. And limited in certain ways.

Your comment about how easy it would be on the freeway with everybody driving the same direction got me thinking. In many cities, such as St. Louis, certain lanes of the freeway switch direction, based on the time of day. What technology would be necessary in a self driving car to be aware of this? We people read flashing signs and colored lights that warn of the change over. Will the DOT be expected to emit another type of signal (without error) to driverless cars? Just one of thousands of everyday scenarios that an automatic car would have to be prepared for.


74 posted on 05/26/2014 4:53:08 PM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson