Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freeping Since 2001; strider44
FS2001, I would never dispute that two men or two women could do a fine job at many parenting tasks--- in the sense of being able to feed, clothe, shelter and educate a child, be warm and responsive, shield him from danger, and foster his God-given gifts. These competencies may be found as abundantly in SS couples as in mom & dad couples. As well as in orphanages, group homes, mother-grandmother households, or any number of permutations and combinations of caregivers.

But the very fact that the child is set up for a planned adoption by two men or two women, means they -- or the agency that set it up --- think either that a child has no right to a father, or that a child has no right to a mother.

They're deficient in the very area where diversity and balance counts: diversity in relating to a father AND a mother, and balance in experiencing day by day the affective complementarity of marriage: of a man and a woman in a good marital relationship.

Walker Percy and his two younger brothers were raised well by their homosexual but singleton second cousin, William Alexander Percy. Clarence Thomas was raised by his grandfather, Myers Anderson. God bless those who are thrust by happenstance into a broken situation. Bless them as they do as well as they can. Sometimes --- often --- a child could get stuck in a an unbalanced situation by chance.

But it should not be imposed on any child by choice.

107 posted on 06/02/2014 2:16:44 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Small disconnected facts, if you take note of them, have a way of becoming connected. - Walker Percy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o
But it should not be imposed on any child by choice.

Precisely. We have seen the talking points in this very thread. They use the most dire situation possible (retarded child facing life in orphanage) to justify what is fast becoming state-mandated gay parenting. That is, adoption agencies are being required by law to treat all prospective adoptive couples the same, without regard to such old-fashioned notions as "mothers" and "fathers."

109 posted on 06/02/2014 2:40:50 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Some kids wait an awful long time to be adopted. Unless they fit the desirable criteria. It is what is is. We’ve had several adoptions in the family. If you tell the agency you will take any race or kids with serious medical issues your wait time is less. My sister got a black infant within 5 months of joining an agency. The cold reality is not too many married couples are willing to adopt a baby with Downs. Unfortunately as we all know many Downs babies are terminated before birth. An on-going crime against humanity. In my case I’ve seen 2 Lesbians change the lives of 2 Downs kids vastly for the better.


111 posted on 06/02/2014 3:44:20 PM PDT by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson