Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
-- I simply don't believe that ceding the power to define marriage to the government is a good idea. --

The government asserts itself in that arena. There is no "ceding" to it, it has "always" claimed power in that arena. There is no way to get the government out of it.

The government used to act to uphold sound tradition. For the past 80 years or so, it has been a force of tearing down tradition, and setting itself up for a bigger piece of the pie.

The only reason I don't see this as a political issue is that it is being decided by judges, who are roughly out of political reach. The politicians don't want to be involved in anything controversial, and are all too happy to let the judges help with running the country into the ground (although I am sure that neither group sees itself as doing any harm). A person who sees judges as in the political realm will disagree with my "not political" label. I don't recall hearing a single politician or candidate articulate a policy of impeachment and removal of judges who find a constitutional right to homosexual marriage. Unless those candidates start appearing, there isn't a political solution in any form!

236 posted on 06/04/2014 2:08:54 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Judges are part of the political system and voting.

We defeat them with conservative politics.


242 posted on 06/04/2014 2:15:17 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson