To: Iced Tea Party
First and foremost, the Constitution does not delegate marriage issues to the federal government. Their meddling in your marital and other personal status on tax forms ends with a simple 10%-15% FLAT TAX. Done.
Secondly, the people of each state need to decide to leave marriage out of state government's hands. Same issue: flat tax solves state meddling in martial and other personal status.
6 posted on
06/04/2014 10:26:13 AM PDT by
PapaNew
To: PapaNew
If it were only an issue about money, then problem solved.
Homosexual marriage isn’t about tax status.
7 posted on
06/04/2014 10:28:30 AM PDT by
Reddy
(bo stinks)
To: PapaNew
First and foremost, the Constitution does not delegate marriage issues to the federal government. Their meddling in your marital and other personal status on tax forms ends with a simple 10%-15% FLAT TAX. Done. Bingo.
But they will fight against that idea tooth-and-nail because it cuts out a lot of their power (esp. that which can be arbitrarily applied) and forces actual transparency.
25 posted on
06/04/2014 10:43:36 AM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: PapaNew
Getting rid of the ridiculous complexities of the tax code would solve a lot of problems, including this one.
To: PapaNew
Evidently the constitution does allow the government to decide on marriage issues for itself, since the Congress was passing laws regarding marriage, from the beginning.
172 posted on
06/04/2014 1:08:05 PM PDT by
ansel12
((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson