That’s one of the most poorly constructed polls I’ve ever seen. Some intern must have designed it. The third and fourth choices are non-responsive to the question, which requires a “yes” or “no” response.
The Washington Times’ intent was to divide the “No” votes. Whereby they could say “Well only x number vote “No”..” When in reality any vote but “yes” is a “no” vote.
They are trying to soften what would rightly be “Yes by 7%” and “No by 93%”. (Damnation)
The developing meme being those people calling him a “deserter” are just haters or are somehow irrational.