ICR article image.
Culture/Society
Discussion of health, education, welfare, drugs, abortion, environment, housing, unions, employment, social security, religion, arts, humanity, sports, and other cultural and societal issues.
ICR article image.
I’m incapable of understanding how complexity disproves science? That we are constantly learning more and refining our understanding of how things work is part and parcel of scientific research. It is to be expected that as we discover new tools for observation, etc., we learn more details about what we are studying. Irreducible complexity seems to be a meme of young earth creationists. Are we supposed to say, “Gee, that’s too complicated for me, let’s take it on faith and stop trying to understand it”. I guess so.
So if something is more complicated than you at first thought, it means that creationism is true?
Come on. Usually the first work in a field is simple, and approximate. Then (hopefully) there are improvements.
The whole creationist movement is a big embarrassment. It is also not particularly pious. It pretends to know what is unknowable, and totally distorts the meaning of the Bible.
The Bible is not a book about geology; it is not a treatise on biology. Is that not clear? It is about other things, on which one’s mind should be focused.
Hey, give us all a break.