Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wbarmy

Even your Dr. Hamm acknowledges what he calls “microevolution” where mutations can change an organism is they give the organism better survivability. Bacteria become resistant to certain antibiotics over time. That is evolution. Science does not concern itself with macro evolution because it’s reached in the same manner as the resistant bacteria.

There are no “duckagators” half duck and half alligator. That’s a tired misrepresentation put up by creationist pseudo scientists to disprove evolution in the fossil record. There are, however, fossils of small dinosaurs with feathers, small dinosaurs that used their feathers to glide tree to tree, there are primitive birds with teeth and finally, fossils of many different kinds of birds existing at the same time as dinosaurs. That chain of fossils show the evolutionary path of birds, some of whom survived the mass extinction that killed off the other dinosaurs. That’s how transitional fossils work. Look it up in some other source than the creationist web sites that are more interested in making money off sincere Christians.


16 posted on 06/05/2014 12:17:25 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: JimSEA

Microevolution is changes within a certain species, there is no change out of one specie to another. The better survivability which you speak of is the preexistence of the survival gene within the community, the poison kills off those without the genetic strain. Nothing new has actually been added, it has just been highlighted by the death of all the others. There is no mutation discovered anywhere which changes an organism into another organism.

I also noticed how you changed the subject to another one without really answering the first argument, and how you make ad hominum attacks. Also, he is not “my” Dr. Hamm, he is his own person and says what he wants to or believes in.

The fossil record is the most pathetic proof of anything to ever be foisted upon the public. The primitive birds you speak of were anything but primitive and had full operating bird characteristics such as avian lungs and breastbones. Using that type of chain of fossils is as stupid as the horse sequence where horses from different continents and time eras were put in a wholly imaginary sequence to “prove” their evolution. Keep believing what you want, but day after day, more scientists change from evolutionists to creationists as the real evidence piles against that belief.


17 posted on 06/05/2014 12:30:27 PM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson