Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass Shootings Aren’t On the Rise
New York Media ^ | June 11, 2014 | Jesse Singal

Posted on 06/12/2014 9:44:31 AM PDT by holymoly

It's only natural, faced with atrocities like those that took place in Aurora or Sandy Hook or Isla Vista, to sink into a "What the hell is wrong with the world?" attitude. And based on the conversations that often follow these tragedies, it would be easy to think that life in the United States is as dangerous as ever, that the country is an increasingly violent, brutal place. Luckily, the statistics tell a different story.

James Alan Fox, a criminologist at Northeastern University and frequent commentator on criminal justice issues, has kept a close eye on the numbers, tracking mass-shooting incidents with four or more fatalities between 1976 and 2012 — the most recent year for which FBI data are available. Data he provided Science of Us produced the following graph:

It's clear that there is no major upward trend. And slicing the data differently doesn't make a difference — Fox said that since homicides are on the downswing in general, the overall shape of the graph wouldn't change much if you changed the definition of a mass shooting to, say, three victims or more. There isn't even any upswing in the number of school shooting victims, at least based on the Department of Education's own official statistics (PDF).

Why, then, is there such a powerful feeling that things are getting worse? Media coverage plays a big role. It's almost hard to believe today, but there was a time in the not too distant past when people in New York might not even hear about a school shooting that happened across the country. Today, every incident immediately explodes onto the national stage and is then amplified a millionfold by social media. It's a visceral example of the availability heuristic — the easier it is for us to think of a certain type of event (whether a school shooting or a plane crash), the higher we rate its probability. But this is an illusion; just because it's easier than it ever has been to think of an example of a shooting doesn't mean these events are more likely than they were in the past.

All that said, the United States remains a very dangerous place by the standards of other developed countries (PDF), and little progress is being made on gun control, mental health, and other factors that contribute to the nation's higher-than-it-should-be homicide rate. But overall, things aren't getting worse by the year. To paraphrase Bill Clinton, trend lines are more important than headlines — or tweets or Facebook posts.

[Update: Owing to an editing error on my part, the graph we originally posted for this story was slightly off, and indicated higher numbers of incidents and victims than the data shows. The old, incorrect graph can still be viewed here, and an XLS sheet of Fox's data can be downloaded here.]


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist
FYI: I don't know if the above site allows hotlinking. If no GIF appears above, go to the site to view the line-graph. regarding mass shootings, from 1976 to 2011 (from FBI statistics),
1 posted on 06/12/2014 9:44:31 AM PDT by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holymoly
and little progress is being made on gun control, mental health, and other factors that contribute to the nation's higher-than-it-should-be homicide rate

An unproven and undocumented assumption.

Gun control has little if any impact on crime statistics, except that it restricts law abiding citizen's ability to defend themselves.

There is only one major factor affecting crime stats; The available number criminals in a given area. Chicago, Detroit, Newark and others seem to have bumper crops of criminals to drive crime stats.

2 posted on 06/12/2014 9:58:20 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

And if you take the total numbers from all those mass shootings the media love, they STILL pale in comparison to what happens in Chicago/Detroit/Atlanta/LA.....


3 posted on 06/12/2014 10:06:38 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Wait, are we counting “law enforcement” initiated mass shootings or not?


4 posted on 06/12/2014 10:12:50 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Happier than a Svoboda skinhead with a free new armband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

but en masse stupidity is though . .


5 posted on 06/12/2014 10:30:18 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Interesting study showing that mass murder committed by means other than guns receives MUCH less media coverage that “mass shootings.”

20 people murdered by arson doesn’t support the ideological push for banning guns. In fact, since it shows that mass murder doesn’t require guns, it actually works against the ideology.

So media coverage per victim is MUCH lower for non-gun mass murders.

Note: Study is almost 20 years old. I suspect the disproportion in coverage it shows has only gotten more extreme.

http://www.claytoncramer.com/scholarly/JMME2.htm


6 posted on 06/12/2014 10:35:09 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson