Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cornfedcowboy
Romney would have been a good president. Not my first choice. Not even close. But he would have been good.

Good for whom?

Big Business?

The Chamber of Commerce and their Amnesty plans?

He certainly would not have been good for either conservatives or this country long term.

During his campaign he:

1. Supported Abortion
2. Supported the Gay Agenda
3. Supported portions of Obamacare and wanted to install his RomneyCare(Another form of Socialized Medicine) in all 50 states.
4. Did not have any policies that were supportive of limited Government.

After he lost, just recently, he came out in favor of Amnesty, A.K.A. Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

So just who do you think he would have been a Good president for?
156 posted on 06/15/2014 10:09:10 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

“So just who do you think he would have been a Good president for? “

“good” is a relative and subjective term. Romney would have been a much better president than BO, but there are those here who are hung up on his religion, and will make all sorts of excuses as to why they didn’t support his candidacy, resulting in the current mess we have. well you got your wish and Romney didn’t win, and now America must suffer the consequences. However, i must agree that Romney would be a huge mistake if we hope to defeat Hillary in 2016.


212 posted on 06/16/2014 6:07:08 PM PDT by IWONDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson